I think it's come to the stage where people want to know what really happened, like an Agatha Christie novel. It's obvious what really happened, Bush used political connections to get into the Guard and then took off (not in a pilot kind of way).
It's the coverup that's the problem because Bush is not admitting what really happened. In his memoirs he lied about what he did in the Guard. Now records are being found even though they said in 2000 they didn't exist. It's a bit like Dukakis asking "Where was George?" all over again.
Eventually someone will contact everyone that was on those bases and witnesses will say if Bush was there or not. So the truth will come out, that is no longer in any doubt.
Also destruction of records would be a serious crime, perhaps an impeachment offense. Unlike Whitewater this is potentially about real wrongdoing.
Current Events » in reply to Much ado about nothing
re: Much ado about nothing
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush."
- Like Kevin Drum at Calpundit, Greg is riding this one all the way down to the ground.
- re: Another member of the 187th, Paul Bishop, says the same thing: "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush."
- BTW, do you get the sense GWB is panicking this time?
- Another Tx Guard officer says records "cleansed".
- Calpundit
- what evidence do you have there are witnesses who saw Bush?
- Military Dentist Doesn't Recall Bush
- Do you realize just how absurd that is?
- Its amazng that you can view this as helping your argument, in fact it makes a mokery of it.
- Military Dentist Doesn't Recall Bush
- what evidence do you have there are witnesses who saw Bush?
- Much ado about nothing
- OW.Com Exclusive: Bill Campenni Talks