The Japanese and Germans did carry the war to civilians, as have people from time immemorial. See the Romans mentioned above.
And I shouldn't have said the US changed the rules. What it did do was put it's stamp of approval on the practice, and made it an integral part of the way it conducts itself. The US does not have the "high road" or moral superiority when it comes to terrorism.
During WWII Allied agents in Germany had pointed out there were valid military targets, factorys still operating at near 100% and the firebombing was counterproductive. The message to the folks was they may as well resist as long as possible. (Read "Piercing the Third Reich" by Jospeh E. Persico)
The Israelis have carried that conflict to civilians, only they use armor and helicopters to do it. The Palestinians are "stuck" with suicide bombers as weapons delivery systems.
Neither of them is justified. Both are cruel and inhumane, both are crimes against humanity.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to re: "Intended targets"
You're right. (Is school out already?)
The whole thread (49 posts)
- to coin a recent phrase of yours, Bowser ..
- Context
- The earlier headlines out of Israel said the kid was a 10 y/o.
- Masada
- fanaticism etc.
- Oppression, resistance.
- Revenge
- The indiscriminate use of violence is further illustrated by the use of flechette shells in Gaza.
- "Intended targets"
- re: Oppression, resistance.
- Revenge
- Oppression, resistance.
- Two different incidents. (n/t)
