It's not that easy for the government to hire a contractors in a timely manner to do the work of this kind and the govenrment ends up wasting money and time.
NR
<blockqoute > As NR's Byron York has reported, it's not really true that the company got its work without competitive bidding. In the 1990s, the military looked for ways to get outside help handling the logistics associated with foreign interventions. It came up with the U.S. Army Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, or LOGCAP. The program is a multiyear contract for a corporation to be on call to provide whatever services might be needed quickly.
Halliburton won a competitive bidding process for LOGCAP in 2001. So it was natural to turn to it (actually, to its wholly owned subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root) for prewar planning about handling oil fires in Iraq. "To invite other contractors to compete to perform a highly classified requirement that Kellogg Brown & Root was already under a competitively awarded contract to perform would have been a wasteful duplication of effort," the Army Corps of Engineers commander has written.
<snip>
The Clinton administration made the same calculation in its own dealings with Halliburton. The company had won the LOGCAP in 1992, then lost it in 1997. The Clinton administration nonetheless awarded a no-bid contract to Halliburton to continue its work in the Balkans supporting the U.S. peacekeeping mission there because it made little sense to change midstream. According to Byron York, Al Gore's reinventing-government panel even singled out Halliburton for praise for its military logistics work.
So, did Clinton and Gore involve the United States in the Balkans to benefit Halliburton? That charge makes as much sense as the one that Democrats are hurling at Bush now. Would that they directed more of their outrage at the people in Iraq who want to sabotage the country's oil infrastructure, rather than at the U.S. corporation charged with helping repair it.
(my bold)
I'm not saying it's OK but just that's the way it works. We have the proper authorities to check on the discrepancies of money allowances and will hold the contractors to there claims.
Flame » in reply to If you are getting ripped off, then you should do it yourself.
You mean nobody is being held accountable?
The whole thread (51 posts)
- Tonights Vice Presidential Debate.
- Andrew Sullivan says Cheney was "road kill."
- "Heartthrob verses Throbbing Heart"
- Speaking of Debates.
- recall.
- Prediction:
- re: Good luck on getting the little Geek trial lawyer to bring up Haliburton
- Smack this one out of the park.......
- In the bleachers third row
- Dang, I knew the answer as soon as I hit post.........
- If you are getting ripped off, then you should do it yourself. (n/t)
- re: who's getting ripped off?
- You mean nobody is being held accountable?
- re:I have no frickin Idea...
- In the bleachers third row
- Smack this one out of the park.......
- It will be interesting
- It will be interesting
- re: Good luck on getting the little Geek trial lawyer to bring up Haliburton
