I wish I had the patience to sit and listen through a whole show to get information off NPR. I miss good stuff that way. They charge for transcripts.
Is the assumption that somehow we will be able to attack the launch sites before the missiles can be launched? Hope our enemy doesn't have missile subs. Or that the missile will come from the nation that we expect to attack us.
I'm not saying that the system is problem-free, but it needs to be worked on and developed. I've been following this since Reagan, and a lot of the opponents are operating from the premise that even workable missile defense is a bad idea. It isn't technical. It's political.
If a single city is saved in the entire operating life of the system, it will have paid for itself ten times over. The other option is preventing, by hook or by crook, enemy nations from developing missiles at all. Works for me, but is a difficult in practice, and may involve a war in some cases.
God knows Israel needs missile defense very badly.
Current Events » in reply to Not precisely, of course -- but I know what *didn't* happen.
Launch warning
The whole thread (76 posts)
- The struggle continues
- Maybe they'll have a "science" fair
- "struggle?"
- Pumping "sh*t" down childrens'throats?
- Don't these folks worry about their kids becoming Applewhiteians or Raelians or whatever?
- Speaking of education
- and to the point
- re: "struggle?"
- Jeez that felt good! (n/t)
- ROTFLMAO
- Oh, and PS (and help me out, Fox, Tony, Alcary, Mary Anne- I only have a limited memory)
- Add everything that appeared below since I was last here, and I'd say it was well covered. (n/t)
- re: That countries with borders are sovereign, is a meaningless notion
- Only line I'm waiting for now is "Laugh it up hairballs" ;-) (n/t)
- That slippery slopes only exist for gun control and creeping socialism
- that Republicans are desperate for careers in teaching the humanities, but the liberals won't let them. (n/t)
- LOL!!!! (n/t)
- re: Oh, and PS
- You have to expand the scope to the entire "left" over an entire century to match
- You think this is just about Bush?
- I remember talking to someone who asserted that FDR was going to be the end of the world.
- Whatever. To argue against fantasy counterfactuals requires I rejoin with other fantasies. Then we get into an argument about imagined events. Its like a sandbox argument about 'Spiderman could kick…
- I think Davis post was about very recent history. And that you are going insanely far afield to match it. (n/t)
- HZone in general: ulktimately the litany of error speaks for itself. You can argue these individually until you are blue in the face, but at some point you have to see that its a hionking huge FORRES… (n/t)
- You think this is just about Bush?
- You have to expand the scope to the entire "left" over an entire century to match
- You want to take me on on missile defense, you'd better pack a lunch. (n/t)
- LOL! Your memory appears fine to me!
- Bravo, sir! (n/t)
- That Fox News is fair and balanced! (n/t)
- Just one thing you missed
- re: "the spectre of superstition"
