"I guess since he doesn't trust child molesters to be around children, that makes him a conservative."
Gee! Now that you put it that way! By Golly jumpin' jehosephats! Youre right! My God, such an eloquent expose on the moral content of Democrats! Lefties want children molested! Yep- thats just the essence of truth there! No contesting your steel-trap mind!
Un-friking believably brilliant!
For people on the nihilistic unhinged Left,
Hmmm:
If you repeateldy deny simple observable fact in favor of the dictates of your rhetoric (That Iraq was connected to 9/11)- you might be a Nihilist
If you insist that semantic constructs repeated over-and-over trump the reality of a situation (that we are freeing Iraq)- you might be a nihilist
If you try to sculpt public opinion by phraseology, ie 'Old Europe', 'Coalition of the willing', 'pro life', you just might be a nihilist.
If you over and over insist on logical impossibilities being not only true, but real political aims (occupying a country against the will of the majority as a method to bring said country to democracy ), then you might be a Nihilist
In other words, you automaton, you just MIGHT be a nihilist. Go take a philosophy course, and while you are at it, a course on basic rhetoric and logic. You wouldn't know nihilism if it walked up and bit you on your dasein!
"there are far too many conservatives, and they conserve their resources to focus their slander on those who are competent and effective. "
G, you are just confusing yourself. Don't try.
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to re: That O'Reilly is not a conservative
My god, half baked, your right! (Also called: You MIght Be A Nihilist)
The whole thread (76 posts)
- The struggle continues
- Maybe they'll have a "science" fair
- "struggle?"
- Pumping "sh*t" down childrens'throats?
- Don't these folks worry about their kids becoming Applewhiteians or Raelians or whatever?
- Speaking of education
- and to the point
- re: "struggle?"
- Jeez that felt good! (n/t)
- ROTFLMAO
- Oh, and PS (and help me out, Fox, Tony, Alcary, Mary Anne- I only have a limited memory)
- Add everything that appeared below since I was last here, and I'd say it was well covered. (n/t)
- re: That countries with borders are sovereign, is a meaningless notion
- Only line I'm waiting for now is "Laugh it up hairballs" ;-) (n/t)
- That slippery slopes only exist for gun control and creeping socialism
- that Republicans are desperate for careers in teaching the humanities, but the liberals won't let them. (n/t)
- LOL!!!! (n/t)
- re: Oh, and PS
- You have to expand the scope to the entire "left" over an entire century to match
- You think this is just about Bush?
- I remember talking to someone who asserted that FDR was going to be the end of the world.
- Whatever. To argue against fantasy counterfactuals requires I rejoin with other fantasies. Then we get into an argument about imagined events. Its like a sandbox argument about 'Spiderman could kick…
- I think Davis post was about very recent history. And that you are going insanely far afield to match it. (n/t)
- HZone in general: ulktimately the litany of error speaks for itself. You can argue these individually until you are blue in the face, but at some point you have to see that its a hionking huge FORRES… (n/t)
- You think this is just about Bush?
- You have to expand the scope to the entire "left" over an entire century to match
- You want to take me on on missile defense, you'd better pack a lunch. (n/t)
- LOL! Your memory appears fine to me!
- Bravo, sir! (n/t)
- That Fox News is fair and balanced! (n/t)
- Just one thing you missed
- re: "the spectre of superstition"