How many of them are taking advantage of the government's power to interfere in economic activity to maintain their positions?
Once government is given carte blanche to manipulate economic activity at every level, it doesn't take long for some of the Big Boys in the private sector to see where the power is. Those who play this system prosper at the expense of those who refuse to use the State to tilt the scales. To a lot of businessmen, it's play the game or be run over by those who are playing.
There is a moral difference between those who pay gangsters to rub out their competition, and those who pay them to keep their own stores from being burned down. Political contributions can fall into either of these categories.
Used to be that Microsoft had little interest in politics, with donations to political parties and candidates running at maybe a couple hundred thousand a year. Then Bill Gates was hauled in, and showed by the government in no uncertain terms that "he who can destroy a thing, controls that thing." Gates has learned the hard way where the power is, and is now a lot more active in the process than he used to be. This may be good news. Or it may not.
If, God forbid, we nationalize the health care system, do you honestly think the boards of directors of billion-dollar health care companies aren't going to have something to say about where the money goes?
Current Events » in reply to Or (trying vainly to snap you back to the discussion the rest of us are having)...
Take a look at your examples...
The whole thread (65 posts)
- U.S. Scientists Say They Are Told to Alter Findings
- An interesting contrast...
- My wife was a federal grain inspector.
- But did the explosion kill the person who orderred her to lie?
- Federal inspectors
- "Trust me, I'm a doctor." (n/t)
- re: "Trust me, I'm a federal grain inspector"
- I think the logical outcome of your argument
- Interesting...
- if you stop thinking in absolutes, you may come to understand (n/t)
- Wild mischaracterization!
- Go back and read your quote again.
- You read it right: now how does that imply criminality? (n/t)
- re: Go back and read your quote again.
- Go back and read your quote again.
- Interesting...
- I think the logical outcome of your argument
- re: "Trust me, I'm a federal grain inspector"
- Please explain. Your comment went right by me. (n/t)
- Leave It To The Private Sector Is Tom's Mantra
- re: Leave it to the private sector whenever possible is Tom's mantra
- Yes, and the private "inspectors" will be greased and nothing will change.
- Very naive
- Apply The Power Corrupts Reasoning All The Way Through The System (n/t)
- re: Leave it to the private sector whenever possible is Tom's mantra
- Leave It To The Private Sector Is Tom's Mantra
- "Trust me, I'm a doctor." (n/t)
- The actual survey documents...
- Not surprising
