The fact that the mechanisms are so damn hard to get people to understand is part of the problem.
I was describing independent experts. Just ones that are part of the market process and competition, not necessarily a government monopoly.
The examples of the corruption of government entities that are supposed to inspect our products (never mind government corruption in general) should be a clue that simply being "elected" is not the be-all and end-all of accountability. The experts are themselves corruptable, and have axes to grind, as I showed with just one example.
How many government employees that we trust with our lives and safety are actually elected in the first place? Who are the bureaucrats accountable to? What are their motives? How hard is it to fire them?
Good God, do you honestly think Bush invented government corruption? That electing "your guys" would change anything except a few of the targets of the lobby/government circle jerks?
Remember all the corporate scandals a few years back? What administration did the Enron scandal begin under? What administrations of either party did NOT have such corporate or government scandals?
More importantly, what other alternatives are we given for their performance?
Who might really be the naive one here?
Current Events » in reply to Very naive
The operation of the free market IS public policy.
The whole thread (65 posts)
- U.S. Scientists Say They Are Told to Alter Findings
- An interesting contrast...
- My wife was a federal grain inspector.
- But did the explosion kill the person who orderred her to lie?
- Federal inspectors
- "Trust me, I'm a doctor." (n/t)
- re: "Trust me, I'm a federal grain inspector"
- I think the logical outcome of your argument
- Interesting...
- if you stop thinking in absolutes, you may come to understand (n/t)
- Wild mischaracterization!
- Go back and read your quote again.
- You read it right: now how does that imply criminality? (n/t)
- re: Go back and read your quote again.
- Go back and read your quote again.
- Interesting...
- I think the logical outcome of your argument
- re: "Trust me, I'm a federal grain inspector"
- Please explain. Your comment went right by me. (n/t)
- Leave It To The Private Sector Is Tom's Mantra
- re: Leave it to the private sector whenever possible is Tom's mantra
- Yes, and the private "inspectors" will be greased and nothing will change.
- Very naive
- Apply The Power Corrupts Reasoning All The Way Through The System (n/t)
- re: Leave it to the private sector whenever possible is Tom's mantra
- Leave It To The Private Sector Is Tom's Mantra
- "Trust me, I'm a doctor." (n/t)
- The actual survey documents...
- Not surprising
