Your Problem Is Obvious

Current Events » in reply to You dont have any facts to fit yet

Your Problem Is Obvious

Mark Eby — 3/7/2005 5:02:46 AM (archived)

Even the stories giving voice to her side quote those facts. How could you possibly miss them? I don't expect journalists to be able to put two and two together to counter a good US military bashing, but at least they can admit undisputed details.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (104 posts)

Disgusting - Raoul - 3/4/2005 10:28:30 PM
- "why are they so trigger happy?" - David F Mayer - 3/7/2005 3:29:16 PM
  - re: "why are they so trigger happy?" - Raoul - 3/7/2005 7:57:42 PM
- This might have been a factor in this tragedy - Tom Brosz - 3/7/2005 5:42:20 AM
  - Aw, shucks. You quote the Moonie rag again. - David F Mayer - 3/7/2005 5:25:55 PM
    - OK, fine. - peter - 3/7/2005 8:34:33 PM
      - link - peter - 3/7/2005 8:36:40 PM
        
        Thanks (n/t) - DFM - 3/8/2005 10:44:18 PM
- "U.S. targeting journalists!" Part Two. - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2005 5:37:41 PM
  - Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention - Mark Eby - 3/6/2005 9:13:39 PM
    - re: Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2005 9:28:04 PM
      - Next thing I'll hear is that the wound was self-inflicted. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 3/7/2005 1:17:36 AM
        
        Probably hear that the 'war mongrel' or 'rummy' ordered her assassination (n/t) - SteveS - 3/7/2005 6:58:30 AM
      - New twist on Kill the Messenger huh? - tony - 3/7/2005 1:17:08 AM
        
        Read some of her articles. - Tom Brosz - 3/7/2005 4:08:01 AM
        
        I Guess The Phrase "An Axe To Grind" Is Foreign To You - Mark Eby - 3/7/2005 4:05:12 AM
        
        You dont have any facts to fit yet - tony - 3/7/2005 4:54:48 AM
        
        Your Problem Is Obvious - Mark Eby - 3/7/2005 5:02:46 AM
        
        There are only 2 undisputed details as yet - Tony - 3/7/2005 3:55:55 PM
        
        Big Fat Blinders - Mark Eby - 3/8/2005 3:42:46 AM
        
        stop reading between my lines - Tony - 3/8/2005 12:45:09 PM
        
        Please give us a good reason why we should take anything a communist says or writes seriously. - Scott Evil - 3/9/2005 6:54:26 PM
        
        She was an eye-witness. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/9/2005 7:12:55 PM
        
        If an eye-witness is blind to reality then you are a fool if you invest in her testimony (n/t) - Scott Evil - 3/9/2005 7:25:19 PM
        
        Stay off of juries, please. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/9/2005 7:35:09 PM
        
        Gladly...Forced labor for a tiny stipend is usually defined as slavery. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 3/9/2005 9:33:49 PM
        
        Besides, if the cops want to press charges, they defendant must be guilty. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 3/9/2005 9:35:19 PM
        
        You are just doing that to upset me! (n/t) - alcaray - 3/10/2005 8:45:59 PM
        
        You stated "no facts" - ID - 3/9/2005 12:40:45 AM
        
        Neither do the rest of you. - Tom Brosz - 3/7/2005 5:02:07 AM
        
        The Picture Is Clearer Than Reading The Tea Leaves Of Past Writings - Mark Eby - 3/7/2005 5:07:59 AM
  - re: "U.S. targeting journalists!" Part Two. - SteveS - 3/6/2005 6:37:26 PM
- I'm waiting to see what the details actually are... - Tom Brosz - 3/5/2005 7:21:50 PM
  - Don't let Steve hear you say that (n/t) - alcaray - 3/5/2005 7:40:42 PM
- Maybe Because High Speed Refusal To Stop Is A Terrorist Tactic - Mark Eby - 3/5/2005 4:24:21 AM
  - I agree - Buck Galaxy - 3/5/2005 6:41:29 AM
    - Sorry Raoul - Buck Galaxy - 3/6/2005 3:37:56 AM
- Shouldn't we wait for all the details? - SteveS - 3/4/2005 11:48:07 PM
  - re: What I feared - Raoul - 3/5/2005 9:11:59 AM
    - Your original post was not exactly balanced either. - Tom Brosz - 3/5/2005 7:25:18 PM
      - re: Yes, I'm indeed furious at this situation - Raoul - 3/6/2005 12:08:46 AM
        
        Another Obvious Answer - Mark Eby - 3/6/2005 5:27:29 PM
    - re: What I feared - SteveS - 3/5/2005 3:42:59 PM
    - Disgusting - gbaikie - 3/5/2005 11:14:21 AM
      - Would it really kill anyone to apologize? - Mary Anne - 3/5/2005 12:36:44 PM
        
        Going to be a tough sell - alcaray - 3/5/2005 7:38:26 PM
        
        re: Going to be a tough sell - gbaikie - 3/5/2005 10:05:42 PM
        
        In case you really did not know: I was talking about apologies. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/5/2005 11:26:19 PM
        
        Yeah I know. Thank you. (n/t) - gbaikie - 3/6/2005 12:58:37 AM
        
        re: Would it really kill anyone to apologize? - gbaikie - 3/5/2005 3:31:23 PM
        
        No, not sympathy or empathy: it's apology. - Mary Anne - 3/6/2005 5:27:13 PM
        
        re: No, not sympathy or empathy: it's apology. - gbaikie - 3/6/2005 7:53:49 PM
        
        I see. We don't know how, so we shouldn't try. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 3/6/2005 9:36:20 PM
  - Same admonition: Shouldn't we wait for all the details? (n/t) - alcaray - 3/5/2005 12:02:30 AM
    - I was pointing out details from the article - SteveS - 3/5/2005 12:06:56 AM
      - Raoul was also going from facts in the piece - alcaray - 3/5/2005 12:52:19 AM
        
        Really? - SteveS - 3/5/2005 1:06:00 AM
        
        I admit that I could not understand the French part,,, - alcaray - 3/5/2005 1:19:30 AM
        
        Translation: 'And they say that they claim themselves liberating. ...Eh well, my eye'. - SteveS - 3/5/2005 1:47:28 AM
        
        I pointed out before, and you promptly ignored... - alcaray - 3/5/2005 7:26:49 PM
        
        I did not ingore, your post was vague - SteveS - 3/6/2005 7:14:54 PM
        
        A few links - alcaray - 3/7/2005 7:06:02 PM
        
        Thanks, I read them before, nothing new (n/t) - SteveS - 3/7/2005 8:33:42 PM
        
        If you knew my claim was true, why did you make me search & link? Jerk! (n/t) - alcaray - 3/7/2005 9:14:30 PM
        
        I spent a lot of time searching for your recollection for which neither one of us could trace - SteveS - 3/7/2005 10:12:31 PM
        
        I provided ... - alcaray - 3/7/2005 10:36:41 PM
        
        I see no truth and I don't think your claim is true (n/t) - SteveS - 3/7/2005 10:02:53 PM
        
        What is it that you think I claimed? (n/t) - alcaray - 3/7/2005 10:13:43 PM
        
        That the British would not shoot at a car or persons who would not stop prior to a checkpoint when warned (n/t) - SteveS - 3/7/2005 10:28:53 PM
        
        Show me where I claimed any such thing. - alcaray - 3/7/2005 10:39:05 PM
        
        re: Show me where I claimed any such thing. - SteveS - 3/7/2005 10:56:32 PM
        
        You honestly don't see a difference between my claim that "lots of folks think"... - alcaray - 3/7/2005 11:14:43 PM
        
        Oh I understand, but I don't think it has merit - SteveS - 3/8/2005 12:23:58 AM
        
        re: "Lots of people think Communism is the way to go." - alcaray - 3/8/2005 5:01:44 PM
        
        Well, at least you didn't call me names... - SteveS - 3/8/2005 6:16:14 PM
        
        Be well, buddy (n/t) - alcaray - 3/8/2005 7:22:17 PM
        
        Thanks, same to you (n/t) - SteveS - 3/8/2005 8:33:59 PM
        
        Oops, I forgot "trigger-happy" - alcaray - 3/5/2005 1:22:55 AM
        
        "trigger-happy" - SteveS - 3/5/2005 1:56:10 AM
        
        warning shots - Mary Anne - 3/5/2005 1:43:22 PM
        
        Red tracer bullets are used to warn people at checpoints (n/t) - SteveS - 3/7/2005 11:31:14 PM
        
        Well she is a communist. - Lee - 3/8/2005 8:39:42 AM
        
        Yeah, it would've been far better had a dozen or so American troops been blown up. - Lee - 3/6/2005 5:19:48 AM
        
        But they weren't, were they? Nor would they have been. - Mary Anne - 3/6/2005 3:19:28 PM
        
        I'm glad you knew that ahead of time. - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2005 5:43:05 PM
        
        Repeat: you don't shoot at people to encourage them them to slow down. - Mary Anne - 3/6/2005 6:19:11 PM
        
        re: Repeat: cars filled with explosives have killed our soldiers doing exactly this. - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2005 9:25:12 PM
        
        What I comprehend: - Mary Anne - 3/6/2005 9:40:59 PM
        
        re: What I comprehend: - Tom Brosz - 3/6/2005 9:52:51 PM
        
        Throwing crap - Mary Anne - 3/7/2005 1:15:05 AM
        
        You've got nothing, right? - Tom Brosz - 3/7/2005 4:06:51 AM
        
        Plus check out where it happened. - Lee - 3/8/2005 8:44:03 AM
        
        What I'd do - SDG - 3/7/2005 9:37:11 PM
        
        re: What I'd do - SteveS - 3/8/2005 12:42:42 AM
        
        Not bad. - Tom Brosz - 3/7/2005 11:24:02 PM
        
        A two-ton block of concrete suspended over the road, and a panic button. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/7/2005 10:15:16 PM
        
        This is an ongoing problem that has remained untreated by our glorious leaders. - Mary Anne - 3/7/2005 2:03:21 PM
        
        WOW... Ummm I hope I am not on your bad side... - R.L. - 3/7/2005 3:21:26 AM
        
        It would take quite a bit more than that, I think, to spatter me across a wall. - Tom Brosz - 3/7/2005 4:20:51 AM
        
        re:The root of the problem is that - Raoul - 3/7/2005 9:40:01 PM
        
        re: re:The root of the problem - Tom Brosz - 3/8/2005 1:26:33 AM
        
        re: re:The root of the problem - Raoul - 3/9/2005 7:20:56 PM
        
        re: warning shots - SteveS - 3/5/2005 4:21:45 PM
        
        re: re:Several months ago - Raoul - 3/5/2005 11:59:58 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (104 posts)