On Apology by Aaron Lazare. It first came to my attention reviewed in the most recent issue of the review journal Science Books & Films, where it was reviewed by a medical reviewer in the psychology section. In a rating system in which two stars is the highest recommendation, it received one star. The reviewer cited the lack of an index and the fact that there has been very little statistical analysis on apologies at this point for Lazare to include.
I have been hearing more about apology in medical practice, though, and its helpful effect on the rate of malpractice suits.
If an apology is not necessary in this case in Iraq, it can only be because the shootings were on purpose. Were they a mistake or not? More to the point, if they were a mistake, how can we possibly open a discussion of the events to prevent such mistakes from happening again if we don't admit the mistake? And how can we admit a mistake without apologizing, unless we don't really care whether anyone except us is injured or killed? If we only care about ourselves, then why should anyone else care about us?
Current Events » in reply to re: Would it really kill anyone to apologize?
No, not sympathy or empathy: it's apology.
The whole thread (104 posts)
- Disgusting
- "why are they so trigger happy?"
- This might have been a factor in this tragedy
- "U.S. targeting journalists!" Part Two.
- Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- re: Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- Next thing I'll hear is that the wound was self-inflicted. (n/t)
- New twist on Kill the Messenger huh?
- Read some of her articles.
- I Guess The Phrase "An Axe To Grind" Is Foreign To You
- You dont have any facts to fit yet
- Your Problem Is Obvious
- There are only 2 undisputed details as yet
- Neither do the rest of you.
- Your Problem Is Obvious
- You dont have any facts to fit yet
- re: Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- re: "U.S. targeting journalists!" Part Two.
- Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- I'm waiting to see what the details actually are...
- Maybe Because High Speed Refusal To Stop Is A Terrorist Tactic
- Shouldn't we wait for all the details?
- re: What I feared
- Same admonition: Shouldn't we wait for all the details? (n/t)
- I was pointing out details from the article
- Raoul was also going from facts in the piece
- Really?
- I admit that I could not understand the French part,,,
- Translation: 'And they say that they claim themselves liberating. ...Eh well, my eye'.
- I pointed out before, and you promptly ignored...
- I did not ingore, your post was vague
- A few links
- Thanks, I read them before, nothing new (n/t)
- If you knew my claim was true, why did you make me search & link? Jerk! (n/t)
- I spent a lot of time searching for your recollection for which neither one of us could trace
- I see no truth and I don't think your claim is true (n/t)
- If you knew my claim was true, why did you make me search & link? Jerk! (n/t)
- Thanks, I read them before, nothing new (n/t)
- A few links
- I did not ingore, your post was vague
- I pointed out before, and you promptly ignored...
- Oops, I forgot "trigger-happy"
- "trigger-happy"
- warning shots
- Red tracer bullets are used to warn people at checpoints (n/t)
- Yeah, it would've been far better had a dozen or so American troops been blown up.
- But they weren't, were they? Nor would they have been.
- I'm glad you knew that ahead of time.
- But they weren't, were they? Nor would they have been.
- re: warning shots
- warning shots
- "trigger-happy"
- Translation: 'And they say that they claim themselves liberating. ...Eh well, my eye'.
- I admit that I could not understand the French part,,,
- Really?
- Raoul was also going from facts in the piece
- I was pointing out details from the article
