I really enjoy going one-on-one with Mary Anne on this kind of thing. The smarter the person I'm arguing with, the more fun this is.
I just get irritated when she, or some of the other intelligent people around here, just dig in their heels on some subjects and refuse to address the root of the problem. Remember the "what would you do in Iraq?" donnybrooks?
The root of the problem is that in a combat zone, shit happens. Some things can't be easily fixed by discussion groups, and "enlightened approaches."
I did not like it when Raoul immediately decided to address this as an example of "trigger-happy" Americans, and I don't see Mary Anne taking a much different view of it.
Current Events » in reply to WOW... Ummm I hope I am not on your bad side...
It would take quite a bit more than that, I think, to spatter me across a wall.
The whole thread (104 posts)
- Disgusting
- "why are they so trigger happy?"
- This might have been a factor in this tragedy
- "U.S. targeting journalists!" Part Two.
- Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- re: Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- Next thing I'll hear is that the wound was self-inflicted. (n/t)
- New twist on Kill the Messenger huh?
- Read some of her articles.
- I Guess The Phrase "An Axe To Grind" Is Foreign To You
- You dont have any facts to fit yet
- Your Problem Is Obvious
- There are only 2 undisputed details as yet
- Neither do the rest of you.
- Your Problem Is Obvious
- You dont have any facts to fit yet
- re: Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- re: "U.S. targeting journalists!" Part Two.
- Funny Thing CNN Failed To Mention
- I'm waiting to see what the details actually are...
- Maybe Because High Speed Refusal To Stop Is A Terrorist Tactic
- Shouldn't we wait for all the details?
- re: What I feared
- Same admonition: Shouldn't we wait for all the details? (n/t)
- I was pointing out details from the article
- Raoul was also going from facts in the piece
- Really?
- I admit that I could not understand the French part,,,
- Translation: 'And they say that they claim themselves liberating. ...Eh well, my eye'.
- I pointed out before, and you promptly ignored...
- I did not ingore, your post was vague
- A few links
- Thanks, I read them before, nothing new (n/t)
- If you knew my claim was true, why did you make me search & link? Jerk! (n/t)
- I spent a lot of time searching for your recollection for which neither one of us could trace
- I see no truth and I don't think your claim is true (n/t)
- If you knew my claim was true, why did you make me search & link? Jerk! (n/t)
- Thanks, I read them before, nothing new (n/t)
- A few links
- I did not ingore, your post was vague
- I pointed out before, and you promptly ignored...
- Oops, I forgot "trigger-happy"
- "trigger-happy"
- warning shots
- Red tracer bullets are used to warn people at checpoints (n/t)
- Yeah, it would've been far better had a dozen or so American troops been blown up.
- But they weren't, were they? Nor would they have been.
- I'm glad you knew that ahead of time.
- But they weren't, were they? Nor would they have been.
- re: warning shots
- warning shots
- "trigger-happy"
- Translation: 'And they say that they claim themselves liberating. ...Eh well, my eye'.
- I admit that I could not understand the French part,,,
- Really?
- Raoul was also going from facts in the piece
- I was pointing out details from the article
