If I assumed an answer this time around I wouldn't have asked the questions. All the questions were based on reevaluating past assumptions. You are familiar with the concept of hypothesis testing aren't you?
Unlike certain people interested in restricting free speech, I'm OK with using any definition you can find in a dictionary. It's a fine good and honest answer to say yes to 1 but no to 2 in answer to the question is it a documentary. You also deserve credit for responding fully and accurately knowing by context that I was using definition 2, but not playing games like your brother and others would by acting like 1 is the only possible definition.
And I will be quite willing to admit my stereotype was very inaccurate if most answers are like your's and Fox's as opposed to evasive or uninformative or ones like Robert's and your brother's.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to OK, I will bite...
Pretty Honest
The whole thread (92 posts)
- An open letter to President Bush from Micheal Moore
- MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- Honestly
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- OK, I will bite...
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- Truthful answers to a dishonest test
- Weaseling and Waffling Not Needed
- I love you, man! (n/t)
- Mark Eby, in a nutshell
- "I felt like what I saw and heard about the war, it represented a very biased view and there was no way my dollars were going to support such distortions"
- You mean you haven't even seen the movie????
- Weaseling and Waffling Not Needed
- Truthful answers to a dishonest test
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- Yep, he's pretty much hit every talking point.
- Exploiting hate.
- MM Honesty Test For Liberals
