Is any criticism of this administration, it's rush to war and subsequent poor handling of it, or any one making fun of your "leader".
Should we look at your criticism of "those poor ignorant blacks who deserved what they got down in New Orleans because they weren't smart enough to WALK out of the city?'
C'mon SDAI, you're still mad at me for putting you down here on the Flame board, and now you are accusing me of spreading hate.
>"Michael Moore is an exploiter."
I would agree, along with ANY public figure speaking out, whether it's about Clinton's blowjob or Bush's war.......ANYONE who speaks out against these issues can been seen as an exploiter of one side or the other....for political GAIN. Just ask Ken Starr. (That's IF we want to agree with your statement. Forget the free speech thing.)
>" By fueling hatred of Bush, he serves to attract followers. You reposting this here is a perfect example of this allegiance via hatred."
"ALLEGIANCE VIA HATRED??"
ROTFLMAO
Now I can see if you ever got a high post in this country that anyone speaking out against their government would be considered a "hate crime". Especially if they repost another well known writer/film maker with a "Warning: ascerbic post" to it. Please sir, send the fascists in to arrest me Herr Tech 1.
>"Now that this is archived here too, it will serve as a perpetual testimony to exploitation of hate for personal gain, while others are suffering."
ATTENTION MODERATOR: Please archive all of Tech's posts here on the poor plight of "All the whining, demanding victims of the hurricane who put themselves in the situation they are in." Ya know, his "personal responsibility" posts...
I'm willing to spar with you, agree with you, jest with you et al, but accusing me of spreading hatred is a poor excuse of an answer....for anything. If people "hate" Bush; it's because of HIS lies, and HIS manipulation of the American people taking us into a useless, illegal and expensive war; something you and your buddy Ann Coulter CAN'T see.
BTW, Ann Coulter spreads hate by accusing those of who dissent against the war as treasonous. And right now, I'd say about 65% of Americans would disagree with her.
Flame » in reply to Exploiting hate.
Your defination of "hate"..........
The whole thread (92 posts)
- An open letter to President Bush from Micheal Moore
- MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- Honestly
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- OK, I will bite...
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- Truthful answers to a dishonest test
- Weaseling and Waffling Not Needed
- I love you, man! (n/t)
- Mark Eby, in a nutshell
- "I felt like what I saw and heard about the war, it represented a very biased view and there was no way my dollars were going to support such distortions"
- You mean you haven't even seen the movie????
- Weaseling and Waffling Not Needed
- Truthful answers to a dishonest test
- re: MM Honesty Test For Liberals
- Yep, he's pretty much hit every talking point.
- Exploiting hate.
- MM Honesty Test For Liberals
