Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: No. you give me credit for a better sense of humor than I have.

that's very similar to my objection
alcaray — (archived)

You've got two models of biological origin. How - scientifically - do you determine which is true? In your mind is there *no* observation that could tell us finally if we were created as we are or if we came to be this way by a long process that followed the physical law we know? I think you are giving up too easily.

Now I will grant you that there's a lot of observation that confirms biological evolution. But I would assert that none of those observations refute creation. If you posit miraculous creation, then you may posit that it could create in any way it chose - even one that looks like what we see.

Or turn their approach over: make a prediction of an observation that can disprove a creation model.

I don't see any reason why this can't be handled scientifically. I would not declare the topic too preposterous to consider.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (48 posts)