re: So what? Science doesnh't have a monopoly on deciding truth and fact.
Instead of thinking of ID as 'science'. [assuming you have the correct definition of 'science'] Why not consider it part of 'philosophy'? Or even beyond philosophy and 'science'...why not consider ID as a transcendent link to science?
ID is religious fundamentalist agenda- it is not science or philosophy, it is simply dishonest ignorant crap... and we will pay dearly if it is allowed in our schools.
