Re: Iron Crusts, Solar Induction & Galactic Induction
Welcome to the HabitableZone Mr. Mozina.
No, I used several types of images, including Doppler images and running difference images to show that there IS as surface under the photosphere. Two weeks after Dr. Manuel and I published our first paper, a "stratified layer" was confirmed by heliosiesmology via Stanford.
I see no surface in any of the images you presented. I see a sphere of demodulating plasma with wildly gyrating magnetic field driven eruptions.
Even in my wildest imagination, I cannot fathom anything resembling a crust forming on the sun. At best, I can imagine morphing gases rapidly varying in density and temperature, which present our probing signals differing levels of reflectivity. The stratified layer you describe is likely the rapidly changing temperature morphing the gases from plasma of varying densities/properties.
Different parts of the sun rotate at different rates. This makes the sun something of a circular Rubik's cube. It also means you can't have a solid crust anywhere.
These varying rotation rates can also be seen like an alternating current motor. The electromagnetic rotor turns within the conductive stator and electricity is generated.
In the sun the plasma rotates in accordance with regularity, indicating it is driven by some stable process. At the same time these varying rates of rotation INDUCE magnetic activity along these "magnetic bands" of the sun where most of the activity/eruptions occur.
Take a look at this diagram to see what I mean:
Clearly some of the plasma acts as a conductor while other parts of the sun act as the fixed electromagnet.
Now the question is why do galaxies generate "solar alternators" in the form of stars?
The answer?
Induction.
The galactic arms movement through space generates magnetic activity. Sun "alternators" are the byproduct of this galactic motion:
Yes, there are still many things we have to learn about stars. The life cycle of a star is likely much longer than we think. The calculations based upon the use of all the hydrogen are, in my opinion, quite erroneous. The star is linked to the motion of the galaxy and I suspect generates basic hydrogen and other atoms via these inductive processes.
The good news is two-fold if my assumptions are accurate. The sun will last much longer than currently expected. It will also not experience the "life cycle" stages presently theorized to take place. This would also mean red giant stars have always been red giants, white dwarf stars have been white dwarves, etcetera- and solar size is determined when they are formed by the galactic motion. The down side is we don't know if a sudden change in galactic movement would cut off the inductive current to our sun and it simply collapses, while forming a new sun, a new outlet for this energy, somewhere else.
Well, that's more than enough for now. Hearty debate is encouraged here at the zone.
Again, welcome and thank you for replying to my earlier comments as it has allowed me an opportunity to clarify my own theoretical musings.
;-)
SDAI-Tech1