Off Topic — HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to re: 8^) I was SO hoping you would show up!

Complete nonsense
R.L. — (archived)

The Stanford paper IN NO WAY supports your ludicrous claims... The Stanford paper in fact mentions observations that would seem to be at odds with your claim... Just because the author talks of stratification does NOT mean that they are talking about a solid Iron shell. In fact, in reading the references that you claim support your wild claim it becomes rather apparent that you either do not understand what they are saying or that you are deliberately misrepresenting them. Either way it says little good about your credibility... For instance the Stanford paper refers to a variable radius for the sun, how is this at all compatible with your claims that it has a solid surface...? How could such a surface exist without collapsing? WHY should we discard a model based on decades of real science for one that seems to be delusional and NOT based on science at all.

The problems with your "theory" are numerous and were patiently addressed on the Bad Astronomy forum... a forum, I see, that had to temporarily ban you for your unprofessional behavior and refusal to back up your claims.

Your image manipulation is not 'evidence' and it is laughable that you think it is. It is no better than the loons that manipulate pictures of Mars in order to find alien artifacts. There is nothing to your claims that has any merit, and there is MUCH data and common sense that flat out contradicts your 'theory'....

There is a REASON why people are laghing at you....

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (91 posts)