I somehow knew a mom, and a librarian who works with kids, would get it loud and clear on all channels.
Thank God we are seeing more women, and men, who are beginning to understand that creating a human being and the associated legacies into the future, is not an inferior calling to moving papers around in a cubicle. How many people hold their Most Valuable Employee or Executive Performance awards close to them on their deathbeds?
If most of us disappeared from our jobs in a puff of purple smoke, we would be replaced in a week. The loss of a loving grandma leaves a hole in people's lives that would swallow an aircraft carrier. I know.
And for the record, as long as Grandma is being Grandma to her grandchildren, it makes no difference if she's a fat little lady who makes cookies or someone who rides motorcycles in races. The stereotypes are the least of the issue.
Off Topic » in reply to Loss is always sad.
Thanks, Mary Anne.
The whole thread (38 posts)
- Want Grandma? Get an appointment.
- Sounds like just another Baby Boomer singing the song...
- Why sad? (n/t)
- Loss is always sad.
- Thanks, Mary Anne.
- The social dynamics are changing....
- "Would Tom find it as sad if it was a Grandfather?" Yes.
- Don't have kids, do you? :-)
- ...but children are not.
- Again....
- I have to agree 100%with MA on this.
- Of course you do, but then- you ARE a neanderthal
- Wisdom from a "Neanderthal".
- Thank you.
- Cut R.L. some slack.
- I read that article a couple of months ago....
- LOL
- Cut R.L. some slack.
- A prime example of what happens when kids aren't given enough love.
- Of course you do, but then- you ARE a neanderthal
- Loss is always sad.
