Playing defense. comprehensive reply

Space/Science » in reply to Build astronomical observatories on the Moon?

Playing defense. comprehensive reply

et — 11/10/2006 4:12:25 AM (archived)

Or is it de-fence? I don't have a horse in this race, but I'm game for a debate on this one.

How about an observatory with all the benefits of a Webb (NGST) with more of a platform for analysis of the light from the "bucket". Not just IR but up through the UV.

And what's that cylinder next to it? It's the low-angle-of-reflection lens of an x-ray telescope, currently integrating elemental spectra from asteroids. Black holes are next.

Or, if something requires repair an astro-tech can WALK (ok, hop) OVER AND FIX IT! This does assume an occasionally manned moon base, but aren't we headed in that direction anyway?

And as for targeting, all the big questions will still be there within a year for which to point to. Let Hubble pick the visible glow of a GRB if it's still there.

Think big, deep. Deeper...

The whole thread (53 posts)

Build astronomical observatories on the Moon? - et - 11/9/2006 9:04:35 PM
- For radio-telescopes, yes! (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 11/13/2006 12:41:49 AM
  - re: The viability of any telescope on the Moon depends heavily on if we can deal effectively with the electrostatic dust. But it would seem some antenna types wouldn't really be bothered much by dust. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/16/2006 9:49:38 PM
    - Great place to use the Arecibo design. - alcaray - 11/17/2006 4:25:13 PM
      - re: Don't think so...a dish shaped bowl collects dust...even big holes may not stop the collection. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/17/2006 10:51:27 PM
        
        Not one made of wire-mesh. (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 11/18/2006 5:59:43 PM
        
        re: I imagine it would epend on how fine the mesh is and it is electrostatic dust. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/18/2006 11:08:29 PM
- I suspect we will not be motivated to do dedicated missions to the moon... - alcaray - 11/10/2006 6:20:22 PM
  - True. - Scott Evil - 11/16/2006 5:12:05 PM
- I've been thinking of this for a long time. - SDF - 11/10/2006 5:53:37 AM
- Playing defense. comprehensive reply - et - 11/10/2006 4:12:25 AM
  - No walking on the Moon Dust - nick hoffman - 11/11/2006 7:23:50 AM
    - Even if no one visited to stir up dust there would be a dust problem... - R.L. - 11/11/2006 8:51:02 AM
      - My dustup with Nick/R.L. : comprehensive - et - 11/11/2006 7:46:02 PM
        
        I think you need to explore the financial model further - nick hoffman - 11/12/2006 2:40:48 AM
        
        It wouldn't be cheap is right.... - et - 11/12/2006 6:19:07 PM
        
        Hmmm.... I think I have to respectfully disagree... - R.L. - 11/12/2006 1:56:30 AM
        
        We don't disagree much on this. - et - 11/12/2006 6:39:20 PM
        
        re: We don't disagree much on this. - gbaikie - 11/14/2006 1:52:14 AM
        
        While that was a fairly coherent burst of information.... - et - 11/14/2006 5:43:18 AM
        
        I understand that H20 is a greenhouse gas - gbaikie - 11/17/2006 2:43:30 AM
        
        Too bad there isn't a lot of mercury on the Moon. - TB - 11/13/2006 2:26:52 AM
        
        Diamond transmission - R.L. - 11/12/2006 8:06:53 PM
        
        re: Diamond transmission - R.L. - 11/12/2006 8:11:10 PM
        
        and yes, you can get lenses made from salt... (n/t) - R.L. - 11/12/2006 8:08:11 PM
        
        Why salt, why a lens, and why the attitude? - et - 11/13/2006 4:16:32 AM
        
        ? attitude? honestly, ET, I only have respect for you - R.L. (confused) - 11/13/2006 6:48:13 AM
        
        Oh, and as for why I mentioned salt - R.L. - 11/13/2006 7:10:41 AM
        
        And YES, the urge to lick the lens WOULD be unbearable.... - et - 11/13/2006 4:42:05 PM
        
        Sapphire... - R.L. - 11/14/2006 11:25:10 PM
        
        Lets consolidate the theoretical engineering concepts..... - et - 11/15/2006 9:16:24 PM
        
        Pepper lenses, however, have had limited success (n/t) - R.L. - 11/14/2006 10:51:59 PM
        
        re: How do you make an optical telescope without lens and mirrors? - Chris Vancil - 11/13/2006 6:34:13 AM
        
        Tunnel vision (thought) - et - 11/13/2006 4:37:14 PM
      - Thanks for the tips, but I doubt if the Chinese will use them - E.P. - 11/11/2006 2:01:29 PM
      - re: There are also what some call "Moon Storms" every lunar morning along the terminator. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/11/2006 9:22:39 AM
        
        My link talked about that (n/t) - R.L. - 11/11/2006 9:43:40 AM
    - re: Not just optical scopes have dust issues on the Moon! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/11/2006 8:22:07 AM
- re: Build astronomical observatories where it makes sense for the application - Ken Murphy - 11/10/2006 2:01:16 AM
  - re: Build astronomical observatories where it makes sense for the application - E.P. - 11/10/2006 11:21:44 AM
  - re: Build astronomical observatories where it makes sense for the application - ER - 11/10/2006 2:34:09 AM
    - re: Build astronomical observatories where it makes sense for the application - Ken Murphy - 11/11/2006 12:32:48 AM
      - What Do You Mean By Earth Bound? - Mark Eby - 11/11/2006 4:43:05 PM
        
        re: What Do You Mean By Earth Bound? - Ken Murphy - 11/11/2006 5:28:51 PM
        
        re: What Do You Mean By Earth Bound? - Chris Vancil - 11/11/2006 11:45:31 PM
      - An excellent diplomatic reply - E.P. - 11/11/2006 4:22:31 PM
        
        re: An excellent diplomatic reply - Ken Murphy - 11/11/2006 5:41:35 PM
        
        Another excellent diplomatic reply - E.P. - 11/11/2006 7:56:04 PM
      - Thanks, Ken - ER - 11/11/2006 2:15:05 AM
- re: Build astronomical observatories on the Moon? - ER - 11/10/2006 1:00:13 AM
  - Repairs - TB - 11/11/2006 4:46:08 PM
    - re: Repairs - Ken Murphy - 11/11/2006 5:49:39 PM
- Overrated a bit. - TB - 11/9/2006 9:43:02 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (53 posts)