What I meant was "how do you reduce CO2 by legislation, except for the obvious route of burning less fuel". I got the impression they were considering something like a catalytic converter to gobble up the CO2, which is a scientific impossibility.
As for your certainty about the motivations of those who do not agree with you, the inevitability of your arguments, the refusal to listen exhibited by your opponents...did it ever occur to you that that is precisely how you come across, not only on this issue, but on every issue you choose to argue here. And that these issues are tied together ideologically even though they deal with very different subjects. That alone tells me that it is primarily ideology that determines your argument.
If history proves you mistaken, you will still not realize that your judgement was clouded. Think about that.
Current Events » in reply to CO2
re: CO2