And on compromise...
Economic arguments over wealth redistribution, taxes, and socialist policies aren't quite the even playing field it might seem.
In an argument over such things with a socialist, if he wins, he gets to take my money.
If I win, I get to keep what I already had when I got to the table.
If we "compromise," he maybe takes less of my money than he might have otherwise.
See how that works out? It's why it's such a good deal to be on the socialist side of the game. What do you have to lose?
