re: "The motive of those pushing this isn't "health care for kids.""
None of your statistics can stop it because the alternative is armed rebellion when the gap between the rich and poor, the insured and the uninsured gets so wide that emotion and hatred takes over political movement.
So this is what's coming? Folks in Scottsdale & Paradise Valley better lock their doors tightly and prepare for the march of armed, uninsured folks from Tolleson, Laveen & Central Phoenix?
Naturally, this must be why we need Blackwater here at home...to disperse folks with the non-lethal agonizer Lindy posted about?
Obviously Blackwater must be up-to-date on the forthcoming "armed rebellion" of Democrats. Surely you are not alone in your mindset.
I find this attitude somewhat hypocritical coming from folks who claim to be superior, peace-loving, war-hating enlightened folks? Or as Robert would put it "non-authoritarian" liberals.
I didn't want to believe it, but Tom was right all these years... because he culled the liberal agenda to it's most base motive:
Spread the wealth at gunpoint.
The rest of the rhetoric is just window dressing to make liberals feel good about their selfishness, while claiming the rich are the evil, selfish ones.
"Viva la revolution!"
I say, "Let the uninsured eat vitamins!"*
;-)
*Apologies to Marie Antoinette for paraphrasing her falsely attributed quote.