I have a problem with *your* methodology
You want us all to believe in your supposed accuracy and precision, but you play fast and loose with information and data.
You assume that A)any source that appears to support you is correct, and B)sources that refute your argument are obviously in error because they don't agree with the sources above. Simple as that.
You're like an anomalist in a way--you're absolutely convinced that you've got it all worked out. That's one hell of a slippery slope, and you've apparently been careening down it for a very long time.