I'm not up for hunting for the thread, but I recall that you'd made a snarky comment to the effect that Democrats had "erased the issue [of the deceptions used to start the Iraq war] from their hard drives", and I offered an alternative and less sinister (thus more reasonable) explanation.
The thread is here, and to be precise, I said "Just as an aside, it's fascinating how many Democrats have literally reformatted Iraq out of their personal hard drives." Your brackets aside, I said nothing at all about the old "Bush Lied" fiascos that worked so well in 2004.
I was referring to what was happening in Iraq now, to what the Democratic Party had been trying to do for months as far as the surge was concerned, and the position this put them in if they drew too much attention to this.
Your response was that the Democratic Party was in a benevolent "Let's just all move on" mode. Maybe. "Let's just put this all behind us" is where they usually head when an issue blows up in their face, and doesn't really contradict what I said.
As for the rest:
The term "unconscious deception" has no meaning, although I'm sure you and those who did that study would like it to.
Current Events » in reply to re: "Truce?" Must have missed that.
Iraq
The whole thread (47 posts)
- Study: Bush, other officials issued hundreds of false statements before Iraq invasion
- Why am I not surprised?
- Heh.
- Same analysis, different source
- Consider the source
- He got you guys again
- Clinton made us do it......
- Democratic "support" for Bush-Cheney based upon misguided trust.
- For those who are interested.