"That he's a nuclear scientist is nice...but not relevant"
First of all, he more's qualified than YOU to comment on hypothesis. After all, he actively investigates the subject; he's been doing it professionally for 35 years now and you are WHO.......to judge?
Tom, you're just another armchair theorist with NO experience, just an opinion.
You've never looked at the evidence he has, talked with military officials like he has, questioned eyewitnesses or shared information or testimonies among professional scientists like he has.
His qualifications on the subject are 100% better than yours.
End of story.
BTW, I agree with his top four observations. And I would take his conclusions over your interpretation of "common sense" any day. Nervous yet?