Nuance vs. Truth
More spin Tom.
Sorry, but "Democrats have done a few minor bad things" vs. "Republicans are fascists who almost destroyed America and the planet and the sooner they are completely gone the better" is not a good definition of "nuance."
The problem with your argument is that the evidence overwhelmingly proves that the damage done by the Republicans was exponentially greater than any damage done by the Democrats during the period we were discussing. How do you put nuance into that fact? When you were asked to provide clear cut examples of what the Democrats did during their reign that hurt the country, you had to go back to Roosevelt and Kennedy to find things that history might look upon as mistakes but at the time were widely supported by both parties.
I and others on here have posted until we're blue in the face hard, clear-cut evidence of horrendous missteps, blatant Constitutional violations, solid evidence of international war crimes, and outright lies from this administration and the Republican congress and what, you compare them to sexual romps and some shady Washington pay for play schemes that went on when Tip O'Neill was in his glory? Give me a fucking break. There can be no nuance in these comparisons. Nice try though.
Art