I didn't know glass had a lattice structure either, I always thought it was a non-flowing liquid (an amorphous non-crystalline) form of silica (SiO2). The nuclear waste is in solution in it in the form of individual molecules containing atoms of radioactive materials. Perhaps when each one eventually emits radiation it causes damage to the chemical bonds binding Silicon and Oxygen together, causing the glass to become brittle as these disintegrations accumulate over time. But I'm only speculating, I don't know enough chemistry to answer that.
However, if glass breaks down over time in these conditions, it is not good news for waste storage. Glass is a non-soluble, non-corroding material supposedly ideal for long-term encasing of nuke waste. If it crumbles after just a few years of heavy radiation, that is really going to be a severe blow to the industry that was counting on it as a storage medium suitable for burial.
Current Events » in reply to No hard work involved at all
Vitrification
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Yucca Mountain waste site off the table?
- Nuclear power is similar to war.
- There are atolls in the Pacific.
- Bali Hai is calling...follow me, follow me.
- Above ground is the safest.
- Not necessarily,
- Given your timeframe...
- Fission fusion hybrid, purebred bogosity.
- Given your timeframe...
- No NIMBY's on military restricted areas. (n/t)
- Not necessarily,
- Above ground is the safest.
- Keep it simple.
- Bali Hai is calling...follow me, follow me.
- No nuclear power?
