and I think we're in fundamental agreement on the major points. The one place where I do part company from you is
"...a lot of people don't WANT nuclear power to work."
I think those people have every right to feel that way, for reasons I've beat to death on these pages too many times already. But I also think
those people could be educated into changing their minds; but they will never again trust the business community, or a government run by the business community, to manage nuclear power. And I have to admit I agree with them.
Jimmy Carter had the technical training to have pulled it off, and Obama has the charisma and trust, but the former was obsessed with the (now moot!) proliferation issue and the latter just doesn't have the technical background to understand the issues. What will eventually happen is that we'll wind up having to buy our nuclear tech from someone else. I just hope they've done a better job of developing it than we did.
It won't be the first time we developed a major technology/industry and let it slip through our fingers because of greed.
Current Events » in reply to A better facility, please.
You and I have had this conversation before...
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Yucca Mountain waste site off the table?
- Nuclear power is similar to war.
- There are atolls in the Pacific.
- Bali Hai is calling...follow me, follow me.
- Above ground is the safest.
- Not necessarily,
- Given your timeframe...
- Fission fusion hybrid, purebred bogosity.
- Given your timeframe...
- No NIMBY's on military restricted areas. (n/t)
- Not necessarily,
- Above ground is the safest.
- Keep it simple.
- Bali Hai is calling...follow me, follow me.
- No nuclear power?
