As some of you may be aware, I used to extend Sam the benefit of the doubt myself, however I now firmly believe him to be an insincere, attention-seeking, 'pot stirrer' - A conclusion based upon my observation that he *persistently* broaches topics known to annoy many participants on the Space Forum (e.g. PX/Nibiru and references to 'hotsheets' posts) - Was his motivation (as I initially suspected) issue of genuine concern, he would be best advised to visit Phil Platt's site & discussion forum (I posted the URL in response to his [Sam's] inquires several weeks ago) - Yet he persists in 'haranguing' the Space Forum with his patently annoying posts - with utter disregard of their increasingly negative reception…
Well I'm done 'holding his hand'…
Inasmuch as 'his type' feed on flames I choose to ignore him - still I am sensitive to those who find his plodding insincerity and 'deaf ear' routine insufferable…
Respectfully
Dan Sarandon
Flame » in reply to Serious post: On Flaming "Sam"
Respectfully, I don't see intellectual elitism as a central issue here...
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Serious post: On Flaming "Sam"
- Re: Serious post: On Flaming
- Not hard to resist
- Sam, a troll he am
- My view
- Fox, sometimes a spade is a spade
- Respectfully, I don't see intellectual elitism as a central issue here...
- Re: On Flaming
- My impression of Sam
- Re: Serious post: On Flaming
