Obviously the Moon and Mars are very different from one another, just as both are very different from the Earth. But if we are ever to use off-planet physical resources, that requires a fundamental set of mining and initial processing steps that cannot be tested off a "planetary" (or at least asteroid) surface. With the proximity of the Moon, even if the specific materials and environment is somewhat different from that on Mars, trying to do it there first allows a wide variety of approaches to be tried with much lower risk. On Mars, we'll have to get it all pretty much right the first time, or our colonists are dead; with the Moon there's a lot more lee-way to resolve problems as we find them.
And that's also why returning to the Moon will be far less expensive than the first Mars trip...
Space/Science » in reply to The Moon wins.
Re: The Moon wins.
The whole thread (44 posts)
- OK vote. Mars or the Moon?...Mars!
- What the public wants: a lunar based NEO detection system
- How bout a Moon of Mars? (somewhere Fred Singer is smiling)
- Aim For Where We Can Stay, Return To The Moon On The Way
- Moon first.
- Moon first, Mars and asteroids next
- Mars or the Moon?
- Neither Moon nor Mars
- Re: OK vote. Mars or the Moon?neither-"CATS"
- Re: Moon...why?
- Moon/Mars/Orbit - Life boat stations frist
- Well...
