of course that's just my opinion also...
But If you call the undisputed existence of human shreddin machines, torture chambers, child prisons, "peace" then we will never agree.
In my opinion the war was not only "just", but I will go so far as to argue that it was "unjust" to support that sort of "peace".
If we had not invaded, Uday Hussain would still be raping innocent women. Sadam's thugs would be collecting a bounty to throw innocent people in prison. And still other innocents would be executed in U'day people shredding machine.
Thank God somebody was willing to risk the political capital to say enough is enough...
Scott
P.S. The United States did NOT bring Sadam to power. I would love to see a source for that charge.
Current Events » in reply to Re: Because war was the moral thing to do.
They weren't living in peace
The whole thread (58 posts)
- Why War?
- Stop reading horse manure.
- Re: Why War?
- Re: Why Bother?
- Statements
- Nice Photo Op
- and the bullshit tide rises higher.
- P.S.
- Discourse?
- You and Lindy are the sheep in this thread. n/t (n/t)
- Statements
- Re: Why War?
- Re: Why Bother?
- Re: Why War?
- Re: Because it is effective . . .
- Why Lindy?
- Gawd, it's jest killin' you lefties, you were SO wrong n/t (n/t)
- Because war was the moral thing to do.
