<I remember reading that as little as two years ago. Perhaps it's been CONVENIENTLY removed, so the liberals won't have any ammunition to throw at the Bush administration.
Not likely. Why would an antiwar site, especially one located in England, "conveniently" remove anything to benefit Bush? And more to the point, it isn't really possible.
Despite the paranoid fantasies of Rense.com types, it is almost impossible to "erase" all traces of something that has been on the net a while. Between caches, expired links, mirrors, and other such things, large tracks are almost always left behind. Believe me, I know. This is why I can still rub Michael Moore's nose in his own crap despite his constant removal of embarrassing stuff from his own website.
Additionally, I found no web page that cited this reference that even attempted a link to it.
Now, I will stipulate that it's possible for an organization to have no Web presence, and issue only documents on paper. However, nowadays that's odd, and for an activist organization, it's damned odd.
You say you read it. On the web, or as a hard copy?
Current Events » in reply to Re: Stop reading horse manure. Yours or mine?
Web tracks
The whole thread (58 posts)
- Why War?
- Stop reading horse manure.
- Re: Why War?
- Re: Why Bother?
- Statements
- Nice Photo Op
- and the bullshit tide rises higher.
- P.S.
- Discourse?
- You and Lindy are the sheep in this thread. n/t (n/t)
- Statements
- Re: Why War?
- Re: Why Bother?
- Re: Why War?
- Re: Because it is effective . . .
- Why Lindy?
- Gawd, it's jest killin' you lefties, you were SO wrong n/t (n/t)
- Because war was the moral thing to do.
