There are no nukes, Tom. No WMD. None. Zero. Read Blix.

Flame » in reply to Where the line is drawn

There are no nukes, Tom. No WMD. None. Zero. Read Blix.

Bowser — 5/10/2004 1:35:43 AM (archived)

Your analogy makes no sense, none. Was useless, only designed to justify a situation which doesn't exist. Yet. If enough people hate us, it will, though.

As for the rest of your diatribe, these people seem to have been swept up almost randomly. Read their reports, because that's all that seems to exist.

Where are the allegations against them? Where are the records? How are they accounted for?

What are the charges? Are there hearings or trials set?

What is the timeline on these abuses? Do these people have time-critical information?

Why did the US refute the Geneva Convention? Who refuted the Geneva Convention? Did that person have torture in mind when he did it? Why weren't troops trained in it?

Are most of these people just Iraqis, and MUST know something? Are the MI folks just fishing?

DIDN'T ANYONE KNOW THAT MOST OF THESE PEOPLE WOULD GO BACK INTO THEIR COMMUNITIES HATING THAT WHICH HAD BEEN DONE AND THE PEOPLE WHO DID IT?

Is there anything True Believers can't justify? Is there anything a True Believer wouldn't find revolting?

Arf

The whole thread (44 posts)

Questions I'd like to see answered: - Tom Brosz - 5/8/2004 7:37:22 PM
- re: Questions I'd like to see answered: - Nick Hoffman - 5/9/2004 4:04:46 PM
  - Where the line is drawn - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 1:18:15 AM
    - We chose this war. It wasn't forced on us. - Robert - 5/14/2004 5:07:44 PM
    - re: Where the line is drawn - Nick Hoffman - 5/14/2004 2:19:31 PM
      - Yes. And what if - alcaray - 5/27/2004 9:31:50 PM
        
        "Following Geneva protects our troops too." Bat guano. - Tom Brosz - 5/27/2004 10:06:32 PM
        
        'Nother old-thread-punji-pit. Love that sinking feeling. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/27/2004 9:36:59 PM
    - There are no nukes, Tom. No WMD. None. Zero. Read Blix. - Bowser - 5/10/2004 1:35:43 AM
      - re: Nukes was not the topic, Bowser. Read Tom . . . - D. Spires - 5/10/2004 2:40:00 AM
        
        That's why I wanted to see questions answered. - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 4:10:59 AM
        
        All we have are their reports, and the actions of the holding power. - Bowser - 5/10/2004 4:32:12 AM
  - Bingo! - Bowser - 5/9/2004 5:32:57 PM
- No one said they were boyscouts - Buck Galaxy - 5/9/2004 7:50:22 AM
- Amazing. - Bowser - 5/8/2004 10:36:03 PM
- re: The Comfy Chair . . . - D. Spires - 5/8/2004 8:25:32 PM
  - re: The Comfy Chair . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 12:27:06 AM
    - re: Uh-huh . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 1:25:01 AM
      - Whoaa, Dan - Nick Hoffman - 5/9/2004 4:08:59 PM
        
        re: Yeah, give 'em all a plate of cookies, a glass of milk, and a fond farewell . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 5:08:49 PM
      - re: Uh-huh . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 1:51:17 AM
        
        re: Look up FM 34-52 -- and go from there . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 2:04:29 AM
        
        re: Look up FM 34-52 -- and go from there . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 3:54:21 AM
        
        re: Look up FM 34-52 -- and go from there . . . - Don - 6/6/2004 2:49:04 AM
        
        re: Choosing to misinterpret FM 34-52 is choosing to refuse the 'science' you just requeted . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 5:02:44 AM
        
        re: Choosing to misinterpret FM 34-52 is choosing to refuse the 'science' you just requeted . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 6:26:32 AM
        
        re: You're completely missing it . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 8:00:48 AM
        
        re: You're completely missing it . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 11:36:37 AM
        
        re: I'm afraid I don't have ready numbers for you . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 5:03:21 PM
        
        re: I'm afraid I don't have ready numbers for you . . . - Ger - 5/27/2004 3:02:57 AM
        
        Interrogators? - Tony - 5/27/2004 2:02:10 PM
  - re: The Comfy Chair . . . - Tom Brosz - 5/8/2004 8:34:34 PM
    - Bullshit - Buck Galaxy - 5/9/2004 7:44:43 AM
      - One case in point - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 5:36:03 PM
      - re: Bullshit - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 1:29:56 AM
        
        If you want to know what a liberal thinks of Dan's list... - alcaray - 5/11/2004 4:18:39 PM
        
        re: No, hooding prisoners does not go against the tenets of the Geneva Convention . . . - D. Spires - 5/11/2004 6:07:37 PM
        
        This is a question of contract law - alcaray - 5/11/2004 9:19:18 PM
        
        re: Absolutely correct -- however . . . - D. Spires - 5/11/2004 11:00:56 PM
        
        Long-winded reply, as punishment? - alcaray - 5/12/2004 3:48:50 PM
        
        re: 'Then what is all the hubbubb about?' - D. Spires - 5/12/2004 10:27:19 PM
        
        I am serious. And I don't get the connection. Sorry. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/12/2004 10:42:25 PM
        
        re: Well, congradulate yourself . . . - D. Spires - 5/13/2004 12:34:16 AM
        
        I'm tired of trying to make sense of your confused and off-point arguments - alcaray - 5/13/2004 10:59:31 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (44 posts)