Flame » in reply to re: No, hooding prisoners does not go against the tenets of the Geneva Convention . . .

The whole thread (44 posts)

• Questions I'd like to see answered: - Tom Brosz - 5/8/2004 7:37:22 PM
  • re: Questions I'd like to see answered: - Nick Hoffman - 5/9/2004 4:04:46 PM
    • Where the line is drawn - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 1:18:15 AM
      • We chose this war. It wasn't forced on us. - Robert - 5/14/2004 5:07:44 PM
      • re: Where the line is drawn - Nick Hoffman - 5/14/2004 2:19:31 PM
        • Yes. And what if - alcaray - 5/27/2004 9:31:50 PM
          • "Following Geneva protects our troops too." Bat guano. - Tom Brosz - 5/27/2004 10:06:32 PM
          • 'Nother old-thread-punji-pit. Love that sinking feeling. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/27/2004 9:36:59 PM
      • There are no nukes, Tom. No WMD. None. Zero. Read Blix. - Bowser - 5/10/2004 1:35:43 AM
        • re: Nukes was not the topic, Bowser. Read Tom . . . - D. Spires - 5/10/2004 2:40:00 AM
          • That's why I wanted to see questions answered. - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 4:10:59 AM
            • All we have are their reports, and the actions of the holding power. - Bowser - 5/10/2004 4:32:12 AM
    • Bingo! - Bowser - 5/9/2004 5:32:57 PM
  • No one said they were boyscouts - Buck Galaxy - 5/9/2004 7:50:22 AM
  • Amazing. - Bowser - 5/8/2004 10:36:03 PM
  • re: The Comfy Chair . . . - D. Spires - 5/8/2004 8:25:32 PM
    • re: The Comfy Chair . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 12:27:06 AM
      • re: Uh-huh . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 1:25:01 AM
        • Whoaa, Dan - Nick Hoffman - 5/9/2004 4:08:59 PM
          • re: Yeah, give 'em all a plate of cookies, a glass of milk, and a fond farewell . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 5:08:49 PM
        • re: Uh-huh . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 1:51:17 AM
          • re: Look up FM 34-52 -- and go from there . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 2:04:29 AM
            • re: Look up FM 34-52 -- and go from there . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 3:54:21 AM
              • re: Look up FM 34-52 -- and go from there . . . - Don - 6/6/2004 2:49:04 AM
              • re: Choosing to misinterpret FM 34-52 is choosing to refuse the 'science' you just requeted . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 5:02:44 AM
                • re: Choosing to misinterpret FM 34-52 is choosing to refuse the 'science' you just requeted . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 6:26:32 AM
                  • re: You're completely missing it . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 8:00:48 AM
                    • re: You're completely missing it . . . - gbaikie - 5/9/2004 11:36:37 AM
                      • re: I'm afraid I don't have ready numbers for you . . . - D. Spires - 5/9/2004 5:03:21 PM
                        • re: I'm afraid I don't have ready numbers for you . . . - Ger - 5/27/2004 3:02:57 AM
                          • Interrogators? - Tony - 5/27/2004 2:02:10 PM
    • re: The Comfy Chair . . . - Tom Brosz - 5/8/2004 8:34:34 PM
      • Bullshit - Buck Galaxy - 5/9/2004 7:44:43 AM
        • One case in point - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 5:36:03 PM
        • re: Bullshit - Tom Brosz - 5/10/2004 1:29:56 AM
          • If you want to know what a liberal thinks of Dan's list... - alcaray - 5/11/2004 4:18:39 PM
            • re: No, hooding prisoners does not go against the tenets of the Geneva Convention . . . - D. Spires - 5/11/2004 6:07:37 PM
              • This is a question of contract law - alcaray - 5/11/2004 9:19:18 PM
                • re: Absolutely correct -- however . . . - D. Spires - 5/11/2004 11:00:56 PM
                  • Long-winded reply, as punishment? - alcaray - 5/12/2004 3:48:50 PM
                    • re: 'Then what is all the hubbubb about?' - D. Spires - 5/12/2004 10:27:19 PM
                      • I am serious. And I don't get the connection. Sorry. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/12/2004 10:42:25 PM
                        • re: Well, congradulate yourself . . . - D. Spires - 5/13/2004 12:34:16 AM
                          • I'm tired of trying to make sense of your confused and off-point arguments - alcaray - 5/13/2004 10:59:31 PM