Space/Science » in reply to Beage 2: As I was saying

a portrait ..

Daniel L — 5/24/2004 4:54:17 PM (archived)

".. but wait - there's more!! For just an extra forty million pounds, I'll throw in this great Martian impact payload .. FREE !!"

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (46 posts)

• Beage 2: As I was saying - Donald - 5/22/2004 1:10:38 AM
  • a portrait .. - Daniel L - 5/24/2004 4:54:17 PM
  • Predictions, anyone? How long before ESA offers competitive prizes like NASA now is? - ~tax leech - 5/23/2004 1:10:34 PM
    • re: Predictions, anyone? How long before ESA offers competitive prizes like NASA now is? - Doug Ellison - 5/27/2004 4:00:22 PM
      • Winning a contract vs. winning a competitive prize - ~tax leech - 5/27/2004 9:45:05 PM
  • A Difference Overlooked - Mark Eby - 5/23/2004 5:10:01 AM
  • David Whitehouse lurks the Habitable Zone. - Gary - 5/22/2004 11:01:03 PM
    • You know this for a fact? - R.L. - 5/25/2004 8:49:28 PM
      • Yes - Gary - 5/27/2004 6:43:44 AM
    • Another article about Beagle 2 - Gary - 5/23/2004 2:18:09 AM
      • Exactly on point - Donald - 5/23/2004 1:56:15 PM
        • re: Exactly on point - Chris Vancil - 5/24/2004 7:40:18 AM
          • Standard practice is to design for the worst case scenario - Gary - 5/24/2004 3:56:38 PM
            • Importance of feedback from protypes - dtb - 5/25/2004 3:21:55 AM
            • re: Standard practice is to design for the worst case scenario - Chris Vancil - 5/24/2004 8:52:16 PM
              • How to Lower the bar and increase science success probability - Gary - 5/25/2004 4:46:42 AM
                • re: I would like to see weather stations and seismometers all over the surface of Mars...either of which need to move around much. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 5/25/2004 8:57:40 AM
                  • What's their EDL system? - Gary - 5/25/2004 4:08:55 PM
                    • re: What's their EDL system? - Chris Vancil - 5/25/2004 8:47:30 PM
                      • re: What's their EDL system? - Doug Ellison - 5/26/2004 9:13:20 AM
                      • re: More on NetLander - Chris Vancil - 5/25/2004 9:13:21 PM
                • Great idea - dtb - 5/25/2004 5:25:37 AM
                  • Build to Print - Gary - 5/25/2004 6:45:29 AM
                    • re: Build to Print - Nick Hoffman - 5/26/2004 5:33:17 AM
                      • I'm only a humble engineer.... - Gary - 5/26/2004 3:58:49 PM
  • don't hold your breath for a refund (n/t) - traveling geek - 5/22/2004 4:45:40 AM
  • Sounds like what they said about Mars Polar Lander. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 5/22/2004 4:44:54 AM
    • Let the space organization that does not have at least one pile of multimillion dollar junk littering the Martian surface, cast the first stone. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/22/2004 7:11:03 AM
      • re: Let the space organization that does not have at least one pile of multimillion dollar junk littering the Martian surface, cast the first stone. - Doug Ellison - 5/22/2004 8:40:49 AM
        • A big difference - Donald - 5/22/2004 2:11:07 PM
          • Yes, there are some differencess... - Nathan Koren - 5/22/2004 11:21:10 PM
          • re: A big difference - Doug Ellison - 5/22/2004 3:10:29 PM
            • re: Beagle 2 was 'too great a risk' - Fatcat - 5/22/2004 6:14:52 PM
            • You're missing the point - Donald - 5/22/2004 3:33:55 PM
              • re: You're missing the point - Chris Vancil - 5/24/2004 8:58:54 AM
              • How much extra would Beagle 2 have cost if they used the NASA airbag sytem? - Robert Clark - 5/22/2004 9:52:19 PM
              • Many space scientists said MPL's landing system was doomed to failure BEFORE it arrived at Mars. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 5/22/2004 9:05:42 PM
              • re: You're missing the point - Chris Vancil - 5/22/2004 8:26:56 PM
                • re: You're missing the point - Donald - 5/23/2004 2:28:33 PM
                  • re: You're missing the point - Chris Vancil - 5/24/2004 8:07:08 AM
                  • Yeah, the failure of MPL could have been avoided if they used an entirely different landing system. - Robert Clark - 5/23/2004 9:12:10 PM
                    • re: Yeah, the failure of MPL could have been avoided if they used an entirely different landing system. - Doug Ellison - 5/23/2004 10:18:32 PM
                      • Are you sure just the NASA airbags without the retrorockets would have exceeded the mass constraints? (n/t) - Robert Clark - 5/24/2004 2:51:05 AM
                        • re: Are you sure just the NASA airbags without the retrorockets would have exceeded the mass constraints? - Doug Ellison - 5/24/2004 9:06:05 AM
                • re: You're missing the point - Doug Ellison - 5/23/2004 10:10:42 AM
              • You might be right. - Tom Brosz - 5/22/2004 4:01:26 PM