Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to ESA getting priorities straight

Should ESA impress us when it doesn't offer competitive prizes of its own, like DARPA & NASA?

ESA won't impress me unless it offers competitive prizes of its own, like DARPA & NASA. ESA has been following NASA's new Centennial Challenges model, but them somebody started ranting about ITAR concerns and that had a chilling effect :-(

Right now I gather that ESA systematically favors one launching company, although I'm not sure what the guy was talking about because there's Daimler Chrysler's spinoff and then there's Arianespace. I greatly admire the cost-effective Beagle 2 initiative but they didn't use the competitive prizes model so they had to bank on one single team's (reputedly flawed) approach. We saw where that got them. At least with DARPA's $1 million dollar Grand Challenge, some of the autonomous rover contestants made it as far as 7 miles even as others flopped like Beagle 2. That's a new world record. And with 50 times the amount of the prize invested by private industry pursuing it, lots more scientists and engineers got jobs that they wouldn't have otherwise gotten. It was a win / win approach for all, except for the government contracting clique and their favorite bureaucrats.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (41 posts)