Ok, you slandering piece of crap

Flame » in reply to R.L., did you denigrate lawyers when you were in trouble with the law recently?

Ok, you slandering piece of crap

R.L. (with a vengance) — 7/17/2004 8:51:27 PM (archived)

<blockquote)And on a different note, prizes would make corrupt peer review panels obsolete. That and the fear of competition somehow justify your defensive tantrums against prizes advocates, at least in your insecure mind.

If a worthless little nobody like you is going to DARE call me corrupt you damn well better have proof- Do you have any proof, you stupid piece of shit? Some of us actually advance our science and technology- others, like you, only have the skills required to whine and make uneducated criticisms... You are a pissant wannabe...

The NSF gave my employer money for us to divide up among outside research projects... we got none of the money for our own use, we made a public announcement that we were looking to fund research to advance a certain technology, we got a dozen proposals and we VERY impartially evaluated the proposals and chose 2-3 that we felt would do the most to advance the technology, neither the reviewers (myself included) or our organizations actually recieved any money- The NSF (wisely) felt that decisions about that proposals should get funded were best made by the experts in the field... HOW the hell would 'prizes' be at all applicable in this situation...

I know that you resent that you arent an expert in anything, but some of us are- and it often makes sense to have the experts decide what research deserves funding- The fact that you dont see this just shows how little you understand your subject...

Funny thing is I was never against prizes, you worthless little turd, I was just against your stupidity and slander- Be assured from now on I am going to make it a point to ride your ass on every stupid post you put here in attempts to spam us and hijack our legitimate threads... You were already on thin ice here kiddo, I will make it a point to melt what little you have left...

The whole thread (41 posts)

ESA getting priorities straight - E.P. Grondine - 7/14/2004 2:44:19 AM
- ****To RL and taxleech**** - Robert Shepherd - 7/19/2004 4:53:33 PM
  - Leech keeps spamming us by hijacking legit threads - RL (reposted by Robert) - 7/19/2004 8:25:48 PM
    - some times you have to sigh and let the bad guy have the last word - alcaray - 7/19/2004 11:16:56 PM
  - If someone slanders me and accuses me of illegal actions I will respond (n/t) - R.L. - 7/19/2004 7:42:25 PM
- "As a result, the panel decided that ESA should leave detection to ground-based telescopes for the time being" - Mark Eby - 7/18/2004 12:47:51 PM
  - Aurora may be postponed - E.P. Grondine - 7/24/2004 9:48:33 AM
- Should ESA impress us when it doesn't offer competitive prizes of its own, like DARPA & NASA? - ~tax leech - 7/14/2004 6:37:03 PM
  - Somehow I doubt ESA, or any one else, gives a damn about impressing you - R.L. - 7/17/2004 10:01:48 PM
    - Ghandi: "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win." - ~tax leech - 7/17/2004 10:31:19 PM
      - FIRST, I am paid by a PRIVATE corporation, You insist on blatantly lying about this and slandering me... - R.L. - 7/17/2004 10:52:27 PM
  - Back here in the real world, leech... - E.P. Grondine - 7/17/2004 3:03:35 PM
    - Are you unaware of the new asteroid watch prizes? Why not planetary search ones? - ~tax leech - 7/17/2004 6:43:01 PM
      - Are you aware of the Free Rider problem? - E.P. Grondine - 7/24/2004 9:56:56 AM
  - re: Should ESA impress us when it doesn't offer competitive prizes of its own, like DARPA & NASA? - Doug Ellison - 7/14/2004 10:36:36 PM
    - ESA's taxpaying constituents know it's the Bastille storming's anniversary - ~tax leech - 7/15/2004 12:00:35 AM
      - And was that event not inspired by the revolution in North America? - ~tax leech - 7/15/2004 1:04:13 AM
        
        re: And was that event not inspired by the revolution in North America? - Doug Ellison - 7/15/2004 7:35:21 AM
        
        This twit was almost banned - R.L. - 7/15/2004 3:46:54 PM
        
        Can't we all just get along - ~tax leech hugger - 7/18/2004 9:38:40 PM
        
        LOL...The funny thing is... - R.L. - 7/18/2004 10:10:03 PM
        
        RL, what does your lap-dog get in return for that posting above? - ~tax leech - 7/15/2004 7:54:41 PM
        
        Hmmm I think he would flame me.. - R.L. - 7/17/2004 7:50:28 AM
        
        R.L., did you denigrate lawyers when you were in trouble with the law recently? - ~tax leech - 7/17/2004 6:39:47 PM
        
        As if we needed more proof of how juvenile Rich the blood sucker is... - R.L. - 7/17/2004 9:44:43 PM
        
        Ok, you slandering piece of crap - R.L. (with a vengance) - 7/17/2004 8:51:27 PM
        
        Google offers prizes but YOU prefer to make government money recipients need YOU as an intermediary. Sticky fingers? - ~tax leech - 7/17/2004 10:05:29 PM
        
        Rich you are getting into legally dangerous territory, Slander ... - R.L. - 7/17/2004 10:33:40 PM
        
        LOL I didn't need a lawyer, you worthless twit, I just handed in proof of insurance to the court- no big deal, I certainly didnt need a leech like you... - R.L. (amused) - 7/17/2004 7:43:14 PM
        
        Now how about the REST of the story R.L.? Ashamed? - ~tax leech - 7/17/2004 10:27:06 PM
        
        I posted the entire thing on community- I find it bizzarre that you think you are making points with it - R.L. - 7/17/2004 10:37:51 PM
        
        50 times more than the DARPA prize was invested in chasing it. Just because nobody would fund YOUR prize pursuits... - ~tax leech - 7/18/2004 12:22:28 AM
        
        ARE YOU REALLY THAT STUPID? - R.L. - 7/18/2004 1:54:15 AM
        
        That's apparently your most rational posting to date. Here's my rational response. - ~tax leech - 7/18/2004 3:40:29 PM
        
        That was not a rational response - R.L. - 7/18/2004 9:06:05 PM
        
        So if YOU couldn't convince 'em to invest, then NOBODY could, huh? - ~tax leech - 7/18/2004 10:46:25 PM
        
        Actually, I did - R.L. - 7/19/2004 2:15:41 AM
        
        So it's not a "sound business judgment" for a corp. to pursue a prize? - ~tax leech - 7/19/2004 3:02:31 AM
        
        Demonstrate you have any experience - R.L. - 7/19/2004 6:27:06 AM
        
        re: So it's not a "sound business judgment" for a corp. to pursue a prize? - ~tax leech hugger - 7/19/2004 4:03:01 AM
- Yeap Their Aaurora Program Is A Good Idea.;-) (n/t) - Mark Eby - 7/14/2004 3:17:29 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (41 posts)