via InstaPundit.
Campos: Freedom unused is abused. Good to know there are still some clear headed professors out there.
The privileges created by tenure are supposed to insulate faculty from political pressures in general and censorship in particular. Yet those of us in the academy, if we were candid, would have to admit that few places are more riddled with the distorting effects of politics and censorship than university faculties.
Academics claim to despise censorship, but the truth is we do a remarkably good job of censoring ourselves. This is especially true in regard to affirmative action. Who among us can claim to have spoken up every time a job candidate almost as preposterous as Churchill was submitted for our consideration? Things like the Churchill fiasco are made possible by a web of lies kept intact by a conspiracy of silence.
The University of Colorado hired Churchill onto its faculty because he claimed to be an American Indian. Anyone who has the slightest familiarity with research universities can glance at his résumé and state this with something close to complete confidence.
Churchill thus represents the reductio ad absurdum of the contemporary university's willingness to subordinate all other values to affirmative action. When such a grotesque fraud - a white man pretending to be an Indian, an intellectual charlatan spewing polemical garbage festooned with phony footnotes, a shameless demagogue fabricating imaginary historical incidents to justify his pathological hatreds, an apparent plagiarist who steals and distorts the work of real scholars - manages to scam his way into a full professorship at what is still a serious research university, we know the practice of affirmative action has hit rock bottom. Or at least we can hope so.
Churchill doesn't deserve to be fired because of his absurd blather. It appears he deserves to be fired because he lied on his resume and has falsified his research. Academic Freedom should not protect him from fraud.
Off Topic » in reply to A journalism professor defends Ward Churchill
And a CU Law Professor disagrees
The whole thread (85 posts)
- "On Culture Front, We're Losing War."
- Are there any real sources for the Hitler/Bush art thingy?
- We are evidently producing MORONS in abundance.
- Tom, in fact you are psreading urban legend. Please practice some of the source vetting and checking you crow about.
- Another item from David Horowitz
- For the record...
- A journalism professor defends Ward Churchill
- It has been no secret that the schools and universities are the Right's next target.
- re: It has been no secret that the schools and universities are the Right's next target.
- Complete and utter revisionism
- "not-right-wing" is not equal to "far left"
- Is Ward Churchill a good example? (n/t)
- How many examples do you need?
- Which trend?
- re: Which trend?
- Just three replies
- Another data point...
- Does the Right agree that girls are biologically unfit for science?
- A column that nails the Summers matter...
- No, but it isn't unreasonable to say that there may be differences...
- Cartoon
- Sex and the brain
- Of course they do -- they invented the concept
- Does the Right agree that girls are biologically unfit for science?
- re: Which trend?
- Which trend?
- What?! You want to hold people accountable?
- A couple of points:
- As the left targeted tehm in the 1960's
- re: It has been no secret that the schools and universities are the Right's next target.
- re: "On Culture Front, We're Losing War."
- When you were a kid - - -
