I understand that oil rigs aren't pretty to look at. But they're what allow you the luxury of BEING a tourist.
Most new ocean rigs are a lot farther offshore. It's new offshore rigs I'm talking about in California that have been written out of the picture. Onshore, there are roads you can't drive more than two miles without seeing one of those "dipping bird" wells pumping away, but I have no idea how many of those are new wells.
This question would take a lot more study than I am willing to do for free. Just in the spattering of research I've done so far, I have found a study implying that there aren't as many restrictions on oil development of Federal land in the Rockies as I had understood there to be.
Current Events » in reply to Alaska?
re: new areas
The whole thread (98 posts)
- Energy projections, PBR reactors, transition times
- Old Chestnuts and New Times
- And then there's this.
- Fracing.
- Talk about synchronicity- anyopne catch the daily show today? (n/t)
- There is also always Methane Hydrates
- Wrong! You wrote: "Nuclear is the ONLY possible scalable technology out there"
- (1) We have been through all of this before
- OK. We shall see what is the bigger producer of electric power in 2025.
- Are there any Sea Solar plants up and running yet? (n/t)
- Okay, sounds fine to me.
- Go for it!
- Singing my song
- The Goddamn Luddites
- Vertebrate mass - think first
- The secret trick word is "vertebrates."
- OK. We shall see what is the bigger producer of electric power in 2025.
- (1) We have been through all of this before
- This is a thread that would benefit from Nick Hoffman
- You seem to write off Oil Sands pretty quickly
- Please enlighten me
- Peaked, or close to it,
- re: Energy projections
- Problem with you is you don't listen
- Renewable Alternatives To Oil Viable At $60/barrel
- the 'running out for many many years' myth
