Primarily, the kind who are obsessed with their atheism (a phenomenon that invites speculation right there), and obsessed with anger over religion. IMO, that this group has been at this for 16 years implies borderline psychosis. If they weren't lucky enough to have a tenuous Constitutional hook to hang this on, these people would be in the same category as the old women who think horses and cows should be forced by law to wear pants.
The author of the link I posted speculates on future "targets." He's kidding, but I think he's going to be unpleasantly surprised.
I would think that someone who wants to reduce government spending on fripperies would appreciate the effort to eliminate a monument to only one part of the public that costs taxpayer money to maintain.
Eliminate government spending that only benefits one small specialized group of citizens at the expense of all the rest? Tell me, do you REALLY want to go there?
Current Events » in reply to A memorial to Christian veterans. We have no other kind.
To some atheists, it's an insult.
The whole thread (47 posts)
- Another vicious threat to our rights to be removed
- Not shedding any tears.
- Wonder when they will go after these? (326KB)
- A memorial to Christian veterans. We have no other kind.
- I'm an atheist, and have no ill feelings towards it. (n/t)
- To some atheists, it's an insult.
- Tom, Mary Anne is right and you are being silly
- If you think they're nuts, would you rather have them in court...
- re: If you think they're nuts, would you rather have them in court...
- "bent on destroying religious artifacts": thank you for reinforcing my point.
- thank you for reinforcing my point.
- The word "establishment" has been tortured beyond all recognition.
- "bent on destroying religious artifacts": thank you for reinforcing my point.
- Yeah, that's the way to do it.
- re: If you think they're nuts, would you rather have them in court...
- For sure. I was afraid that it would fall down and kill somebody. (n/t)