Assuming what you say is true
There should be some provision for euthanasia at the end of the legal wrangling.
"If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twer well If it were done
quickly."
Obviously, the court rulings prohibit nourishment orally as well as by tube. Extending her life by requiring starvation only adds to the political and emotional frenzy.
* starvation is not cruel and unusual, she is functionally dead.
* she cannot be kept alive by machines or any artificial means.
* she also cannot be kept alive by feeding her in any way.
* while dead, she may feel pain so morphine is appropriate.
What has gone on and is going on with TS is horrendous.