Tom holds to a philosophy which values consistency as a virtue. By his lights, calling his behavior "winger broken record mode" is high praise. You've just acknowledged that he'll never stray from the course or the message, and never. ever flip-flop.
We all value dependability (in truth, we all share pretty much the same spectrum of values and beliefs, but weighted differently by personal values). I observe that the conservative mind prefers the world to be simple and direct and concrete, and so consistency of words and behavior translates directly into the perception, by conservatives, of dependability. When Bush displays what most of us see as insane stubbornness, the conservative mind finds comfort in his consistency. He's trustworthy because he never changes. He's the father-figure who will never abandon you.
As I continue to explore the wilderness of conservative psychology, I'm starting to understand that it's a closed system in the Goedelian sense (in plain English: Ever felt you could hold both sides of a conversation with Tom?), and would be much easier to model as an AI. In fact, a rough back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that the mass of Tom's writing the in the HabitableZone database is about 68% of the way to critical mass. In roughly 3-4 years, we may well see the ignition of an AI Tom right here at the Zone. Imagine it: Tom could retire, and nobody would know, as the same posts keep occurring with the same clockwork dependability.
'Course, that still leaves us several orders of magnitude short of true AI, but it's a start...
Flame » in reply to you are stuck in winger broken record mode
Walk a mile in TB's shoes
The whole thread (58 posts)
- General Petraeus' greatest accomplishment this week
- another take on this
- He was attacked by crabs? (n/t)
- I was thinking shrimp, myself (n/t)
- Why do you suppose the methodology for this new spate of statistics should be secret? (n/t)
- It isn't secret.
- I said methodology. Not numbers. so tiresome
- Which statistics in particular bother you? And why? (n/t)
- statistics = numbers. You just repeated your stupid objection that I already corrected.
- *sigh*
- you are stuck in winger broken record mode
- Walk a mile in TB's shoes
- "He's the father-figure who will never abandon you."
- Tom's posts as AI
- re: Walk a mile
- "AP's methodology blew goats"
- Understanding
- Apparently, drinking less coffee. ;)
- Beats formaldehyde
- Shorter version:
- Apparently, drinking less coffee. ;)
- re: Walk a mile
- Well blow me down!! (n/t)
- Walk a mile in TB's shoes
- you are stuck in winger broken record mode
- *sigh*
- statistics = numbers. You just repeated your stupid objection that I already corrected.
- Which statistics in particular bother you? And why? (n/t)
- I said methodology. Not numbers. so tiresome
- It isn't secret.
- Why do you suppose the methodology for this new spate of statistics should be secret? (n/t)
- I was thinking shrimp, myself (n/t)
- He didn't have too... They sstomped on themselves.
