The Achilles Heel of democracy, so robust and resistant to so many other threats, is that it can be destroyed when its practitioners spurn it. If democracy is made possible by institutionalized compromise, then aren't you spurning democracy when you spurn compromise in the name of even high principle?
What principle do you hold more important than democracy? Is laissez-faire capitalism so valuable to you that you'd give up democracy for it? Lower taxes over democracy? Smaller government over democracy? What end is worth bringing down the whole works rather than compromise?
And after you've brought it all down, are you sure that the reins of power won't pass to someone whose interests aren't so aligned with yours? Can you understand that compromise is how a democracy protects the interests of all equally, over the long haul?
"we must all hang together, or we shall all certainly hang separately"...Can naturally fractious humans hang together without compromise?
Flame » in reply to Shorter version:
Is democracy not a principle?
The whole thread (58 posts)
- General Petraeus' greatest accomplishment this week
- another take on this
- He was attacked by crabs? (n/t)
- I was thinking shrimp, myself (n/t)
- Why do you suppose the methodology for this new spate of statistics should be secret? (n/t)
- It isn't secret.
- I said methodology. Not numbers. so tiresome
- Which statistics in particular bother you? And why? (n/t)
- statistics = numbers. You just repeated your stupid objection that I already corrected.
- *sigh*
- you are stuck in winger broken record mode
- Walk a mile in TB's shoes
- "He's the father-figure who will never abandon you."
- Tom's posts as AI
- re: Walk a mile
- "AP's methodology blew goats"
- Understanding
- Apparently, drinking less coffee. ;)
- Beats formaldehyde
- Shorter version:
- Apparently, drinking less coffee. ;)
- re: Walk a mile
- Well blow me down!! (n/t)
- Walk a mile in TB's shoes
- you are stuck in winger broken record mode
- *sigh*
- statistics = numbers. You just repeated your stupid objection that I already corrected.
- Which statistics in particular bother you? And why? (n/t)
- I said methodology. Not numbers. so tiresome
- It isn't secret.
- Why do you suppose the methodology for this new spate of statistics should be secret? (n/t)
- I was thinking shrimp, myself (n/t)
- He didn't have too... They sstomped on themselves.
