Thanks for bringing that up Robert. I remember.
And at the time, I suppose his fears were well-founded, but they were being PLAYED UPON and MANIPULATED by the one of the greatest players in American history. I didn't jump on the bandwagon back then, because I KNEW we were being manipulated. I listened to Bush's first two addresses to the nation after 9/11 and GROANED.
We hadn't even found out WHO was responsible and GWBully was already naming his enemies on 3 continents.
With all due respect to Frank, I'm aware of the Bush crime family, their co-horts, their sneering, jeering, threatening "keep your hands out of my pockets and your noses out of my business" DECADES of control, manipulation and fear-mongering as the White Mob. And those conservatives who've never bothered to read any of the historical books on their use and co-ercion of the CIA are more than just "blowing goats" themselves. They are ignorant of what we are even talking about.
Flame » in reply to Beats formaldehyde
"how dare you play intellectual games when the life of my family is on the line?"
The whole thread (58 posts)
- General Petraeus' greatest accomplishment this week
- another take on this
- He was attacked by crabs? (n/t)
- I was thinking shrimp, myself (n/t)
- Why do you suppose the methodology for this new spate of statistics should be secret? (n/t)
- It isn't secret.
- I said methodology. Not numbers. so tiresome
- Which statistics in particular bother you? And why? (n/t)
- statistics = numbers. You just repeated your stupid objection that I already corrected.
- *sigh*
- you are stuck in winger broken record mode
- Walk a mile in TB's shoes
- "He's the father-figure who will never abandon you."
- Tom's posts as AI
- re: Walk a mile
- "AP's methodology blew goats"
- Understanding
- Apparently, drinking less coffee. ;)
- Beats formaldehyde
- Shorter version:
- Apparently, drinking less coffee. ;)
- re: Walk a mile
- Well blow me down!! (n/t)
- Walk a mile in TB's shoes
- you are stuck in winger broken record mode
- *sigh*
- statistics = numbers. You just repeated your stupid objection that I already corrected.
- Which statistics in particular bother you? And why? (n/t)
- I said methodology. Not numbers. so tiresome
- It isn't secret.
- Why do you suppose the methodology for this new spate of statistics should be secret? (n/t)
- I was thinking shrimp, myself (n/t)
- He didn't have too... They sstomped on themselves.
