I don't see the $725 million that Murdoch paid for National Geographic there... But I am sure his acquisition of it wont change a thing...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/national-geographic-society-sets-biggest-layoff-in-its-history/2015/11/03/2966e1b4-8252-11e5-a7ca-6ab6ec20f839_story.html
I'm sorry, but if you honestly believe the scientists are either knowingly or unknowingly engaged in a conspiracy that vast then there just isn't a hell of a lot I can say. What you allege is as absurd as the the Moon hoax conspiracy theorists, and is just as plainly contradicted by the facts...
You are engaging in the same fallacy... you can never be shown that your beliefs are wrong because any data showing you to be wrong is obviously part of the conspiracy.
Yet - just as the moon hoax nuts use NASA pictures to find "evidence" they were faked, you have no problem cherry picking press releases from NASA to prove AGW is just a figment of their imagination....
The very people most qualified to speak on the subject overwhelmingly say you are wrong- but that doesn't matter because, by your assertion, the people with the most knowledge and research on the climate are ALSO the most Deluded and/or Corrupt.
Sorry TB, there is no way to argue against that brand of crazy- and I think if you are able to take a step back you have to realize how silly it is, because I do think you are fairly bright. But the science if pretty unambiguous on this- you are wrong, and I think on some level you realize this- because unlike long ago you are steering this away from the science at every turn.
All I can say is I have looked at the data and I agree with the conclusions of the scientists. I have nothing to gain from saying so- And quite frankly it is very offensive that you make such accusations against scientists and engineers that do their jobs extremely well. And it shows more than a little cognitive dissonance coming from someone who in all other areas seems to have respect for the work of scientists.
Current Events » in reply to Not dancing.
So the actual science doesn't matter to you...
The whole thread (81 posts)
- Where to watch tonight's Republican debate?
- Chart 4 IS table 3
- Ah it looks like you wisely deleted your post ...
- That wasn't the intention
- Getting a bit cocky, aren't we?
- Cocky...?
- Looks like we're all back for the next year of marathon election coverage
- Hah! Not me. I've got work to do.
- "The Democrats are running a crook and a communist this year."
- Ah it looks like you wisely deleted your post ...
- You've heard of youtube, right?
- Still shaking my head.
- I never took the "liberal media bias" seriously- untill tonight. n/t
- Report from Boulder...
- I don't think it matters much WHERE you watch it...
- Wait for it
- Ticket price
- Chart 4 IS table 3
