Not sure what the point actually is.
Even assuming the Guardian and the CBS "database" is accurate, or that any other veterans besides a Democratic VoteVets activist gives a rat's ass (a more accurate title for the article would have been "Bush's Golf Claim Angers a Veteran"), Bush isn't running in 2008.
Your side will probably be running someone that will do his best to ensure our troops are defeated in Iraq, not to mention other military cuts. Maybe we should take a survey of what is considered "support" among the rest of the military.
BTW, how weird is it that CBS even keeps a "Bush golf database?" Another news story refers to them as "meticulous records."