The moon has volatiles in it's regolith in concentrations up to 230ppm for carbon and 125ppm for nitrogen. Since one of the most likely origins for these materials is Carbanaceous Chondrite meteorites its very likely not spread evenly throughout the regolith but concentrated in useable deposits, here's a link: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/3918/495
Oxygen and hydrogen are abundant there, so we have extractable volatiles and plenty of O and H for making water. I know mars beats the moon hands down for volatiles but I want us to turn away from mars for other reasons I detailed in the previous post, and the moon is a worthy and doable challenge!
I'm happy for the moment to agree to disagree with you on whether we should be looking for life on mars right now, but I will note that in the space exploration 'fanboy' community (including me I need to make clear) the mearest hint of the 'L' word acts like some kind of drug, and everyones sense of reality goes out the window!
Space/Science » in reply to That's a Big No On The Resource Issue, Maybe On Life
re: That's a Big No On The Resource Issue, Maybe On Life
The whole thread (59 posts)
- Panel says not enough funds for Mars or the Moon
- Thanks To Everyone For A Great Thread
- Forget the Moon. Forget Mars.
- re: Forget the Moon. Forget Mars.
- Forget Lifeless Rocks?
- Whats wrong with geology?
- NASA's focus on Exobiology is turning out to be a pact with the devil
- This "lifeless rocks" attitude is one reason why NASA is in the trouble it is in now
- Whats wrong with geology?
- Just how bad...
- NEA and Phobos missions...
