The flaw in your argument is that when the environment in which the workforce are conducting their work is inhospitable, it becomes more and more appropriate to use robots.
Deep sea diving in the oil industry is mostly done by ROV's (remotely operated vehicles), who conduct welding, cutting, assembly operations and recovery. 20 or 30 years ago, being an Oil Industry diver was the world's most dangerous profession. Now, the operators remain on the surface and guide their robots from armchairs.
The machinery and supplies required to support humans in space are a major issue.
I share a lot of your admiration for the free-ranging ability and flexibility of Humans, but if we're not in a hurry, it's cheaper to send "dumb" robots to do one task after another until things are finally done, IMHO...
Space/Science » in reply to re: the public
Our workforce
The whole thread (59 posts)
- Panel says not enough funds for Mars or the Moon
- Thanks To Everyone For A Great Thread
- Forget the Moon. Forget Mars.
- re: Forget the Moon. Forget Mars.
- Forget Lifeless Rocks?
- Whats wrong with geology?
- NASA's focus on Exobiology is turning out to be a pact with the devil
- This "lifeless rocks" attitude is one reason why NASA is in the trouble it is in now
- Whats wrong with geology?
- Just how bad...
- NEA and Phobos missions...
