It Will Always Be Cheaper On a Cost Per Mission Basis

Space/Science » in reply to Our workforce

It Will Always Be Cheaper On a Cost Per Mission Basis

Marsby — 8/17/2009 2:52:54 AM (archived)

Cost per unit of data is another. Spending hundreds of millions to do a few hours of human work is not highly cost effective. I also think we should be in a hurry. I think the biggest danger to humanity is ourselves and having a portion of our civilization at a distance helps protect all off it from permanently collapsing in the event of a large scale man made or natural disaster. I believe at least some of us learn from past mistakes and as a whole our civilization advances and do not agree with those that feel Earth would be better without us. The increase in biodiversity we would create by moving life to other planets would more than make up for even the worst disasters we could create here. I do not believe we have an infinite period of time to colonize space based on limited resources here. My best guess is 50 to 100 years and fear it could be as little as 20. Once we colonize space, I believe our future is unbounded on scales even greater than the span of multicellular life.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (59 posts)

Panel says not enough funds for Mars or the Moon - Jeff F - 8/13/2009 4:57:29 PM
- Thanks To Everyone For A Great Thread - Marsby - 8/21/2009 3:09:01 AM
- Forget the Moon. Forget Mars. - mip - 8/15/2009 4:40:05 PM
  - re: Forget the Moon. Forget Mars. - Baroke Obama - 8/18/2009 4:37:04 AM
  - Forget Lifeless Rocks? - Marsby - 8/16/2009 4:33:15 PM
    - Whats wrong with geology? - Marsbug - 8/17/2009 10:47:42 AM
      - NASA's focus on Exobiology is turning out to be a pact with the devil - Nick Hoffman - 8/18/2009 12:35:30 AM
        
        re: NASA's focus on Exobiology is turning out to be a pact with the devil - Marsbug - 8/18/2009 1:16:26 PM
        
        Nothing Wrong With Geology or Emphasis on Life - Marsby - 8/18/2009 3:09:05 PM
        
        re: Nothing Wrong With Geology or Emphasis on Life - Marsbug - 8/18/2009 3:53:38 PM
        
        That's a Big No On The Resource Issue, Maybe On Life - Marsby - 8/18/2009 4:39:17 PM
        
        ppm?! Those Numbers are near 0.01% - Marsby - 8/18/2009 9:17:56 PM
        
        Ah, I understand where you're coming from now.. - Marsbug - 8/19/2009 10:10:58 AM
        
        True, but It doesn't just apply to colonization - Marsby - 8/19/2009 3:13:09 PM
        
        I agree in principle... - Marsbug - 8/20/2009 10:28:55 AM
        
        Should have Gone Below Marsbug's Post and Clarification - Marsby - 8/18/2009 9:36:07 PM
        
        re: That's a Big No On The Resource Issue, Maybe On Life - Marsbug - 8/18/2009 8:40:22 PM
        
        re: And lets just say they find "life" - Baroke Obama - 8/18/2009 4:32:45 AM
        
        It has already begun - Socrates II - 8/18/2009 1:47:05 PM
        
        Newbies - Marsby - 8/18/2009 2:42:57 PM
        
        Barry D was on HZ? - Socrates II - 8/18/2009 2:48:15 PM
        
        Here You Go - Marsby - 8/18/2009 3:37:57 PM
        
        Yes - Marsby - 8/18/2009 3:14:09 PM
        
        persona non grata - Adam - 8/19/2009 9:20:53 AM
      - This "lifeless rocks" attitude is one reason why NASA is in the trouble it is in now - Socrates II - 8/17/2009 1:05:06 PM
- Just how bad... - dtb - 8/13/2009 6:55:07 PM
  - NEA and Phobos missions... - Adam - 8/14/2009 1:30:28 AM
    - re: NEA and Phobos missions... - Marsby - 8/16/2009 5:02:47 PM
    - re: NEA and Phobos missions... - Jeff F - 8/14/2009 4:44:15 PM
      - Let us be honest here - Socrates II - 8/14/2009 5:10:58 PM
        
        Zubrin's "Gaiashield" is a good baseline... - Adam - 8/14/2009 11:29:14 PM
        
        The Obvious Problem - Marsby - 8/16/2009 5:28:34 PM
        
        I agree - Adam - 8/17/2009 12:35:34 PM
        
        A synopsis of why Phobos makes a good platform for exploring Mars - Socrates II - 8/18/2009 1:24:08 PM
        
        re: A synopsis of why Phobos makes a good platform for exploring Mars - Marsby - 8/18/2009 9:31:15 PM
        
        In the SF novel Red Planet - Socrates II - 8/19/2009 2:14:40 PM
        
        OOPs - Marsby - 8/19/2009 6:27:04 PM
        
        Not A Fan - Marsby - 8/19/2009 5:35:40 PM
        
        KSR's Red Mars is online for free, but... - Socrates II - 8/19/2009 6:27:26 PM
        
        Thanks - Marsby - 8/21/2009 3:13:04 AM
    - They say no, not with current budgets - dtb - 8/14/2009 4:07:44 AM
      - Aye Karumba! - Adam - 8/14/2009 8:02:48 AM
        
        Dumb Question of the Day - Socrates II - 8/14/2009 1:44:50 PM
        
        the public - pwokenyaw - 8/14/2009 5:32:57 PM
        
        re: the public - Marsby - 8/16/2009 5:37:59 PM
        
        Our workforce - Nick Hoffman - 8/16/2009 11:25:55 PM
        
        It Will Always Be Cheaper On a Cost Per Mission Basis - Marsby - 8/17/2009 2:52:54 AM
        
        Biosphere management... - Adam - 8/20/2009 10:53:49 PM
        
        re: Biosphere management... - Marsby - 8/21/2009 6:34:02 PM
        
        We disagree by several orders of magnitude - pwokenyaw - 8/17/2009 3:52:55 AM
        
        Try Using Scientific Terms - Marsby - 8/17/2009 4:36:18 AM
        
        re: Try Using Scientific Terms - pwokenyaw - 8/17/2009 11:15:35 PM
        
        Probably Confused with Podrock - Marsby - 8/18/2009 3:31:31 PM
        
        Confused with Podrock? - podrock - 8/18/2009 7:29:29 PM
        
        Try Using Scientific Terms - Marsby - 8/17/2009 4:27:02 AM
        
        re: the public - Jeff F - 8/14/2009 11:06:36 PM
        
        and whose money will you use to do this? (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 8/15/2009 5:31:10 AM
        
        "the people"... - Adam - 8/14/2009 11:34:22 PM
        
        The construction of Endeavour also required a budget increase (n/t) - Raoul - 8/14/2009 5:45:31 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (59 posts)