Yep. The question is, did you?
I'm starting to worry about you, SDAI-Tech1. The "Dating" post was merely lame, but now, exhuming the 2000 "election" as an argument in support of Bush's legitimacy? What are you thinking?
I mean, c'mon, do you remember a little spot of controversy surrounding that debacle? It's objectively true as well as excruciatingly diplomatic to observe that the outcome of that election was in dispute. That's the last thing you want to remind people of when you're arguing that Bush has a "mandate" (what desperate bravado is embodied in that word!).
--Robert