For you its simply a voluminous barrage of pieces to support your views in opposition to Bush and his foreign policy. Daily posting of any casualties, opinion pieces etc.
To refute each one or make repetitive answers addressing the same issues is pointless. That less US soldiers in Iraq have died then on a jumbo jet disaster is completely meaningless to someone who has made each US soldiers death an example of a US pyrrhic victory..
Anyone who is so out of focus in regards to the potential casualties of such a major undertaking and what a MIRACLE it is that we did not sustain 10,000 plus casualties in the ousting of Saddam Hussein, the conquest of Baghdad and the suppression of his Republican Guard - doesn't really deserve a serious reply.
You, and Cronkite have both stated the UN should have been brought in to the conflict - that we are now going hat in hand to the UN for help. Unfortunately, that is a big pile of horse manure. The only reason Bush sent Powell to the UN was to appease the leftist barrage of media hacks who are, just like you, trying to twist what has been an awesome victory into defeat. They will twist his gesture of friendship into one of weakness. They now perpetually poop on Bush like little Pekingese dogs with a potent and incurable bowel disease.
The voluminous barrage is the choice of folks who have little to say and yet wish to convey that their views are mainstream. The media has been trying hard to convert a group of flag flying patriotic Americans into disgruntled, whining, selfish asses - like themselves - who should almost be embarassed to fly their flag.
Such a task is clearly not easy unless you can bombard the airwaves and newspapers and internet outlets with a 24/7 barrage of hate, whining and appeals to the disgruntled losers who love to criticize and feel empowered when they feel a majority is whining with them.
Your posts are no better than the rock thrower at a lynching. Empowered by the media mob that appears to support you - even though everyone else, with half a brain, sees your death toll posts as repugnant and tasteless, you fling your stones at the President and his administration. These others, because they fear being targeted, sit silently and watch the lynching take place perhaps even shout in jubilation so as to certainly avoid being the mob's next victim.
The liberal media are nothing if not sheep. They bleat in unison with their daily talking points passed in e-mails to eachother and work jointly to destroy the Bush administration. If terrorists are aided by their efforts - they couldn't care less. Their a-- whuppin' at the hands of Rove is not forgotten and so they will now, if they have to, burn Iraq to the ground, wish for US failure and hope a terrorist attack occurs on US soil or whatever it takes to get rid of the popular and successful Bush.
Your practiced indignation is par for the course. "Who me, wishing for US failure?" The media get away with it because they are not posting here - where ANY journalist, including Cronkite, would get soundly thrashed by the assembled conservative posters in rebuttal.
Such intellectual dishonesty and tactics is what earned you the satiric post in lieu of a serious response.
SDAI-Tech1
Current Events » in reply to Typical
I call em as I see them.
The whole thread (41 posts)
- WALTER CRONKITE: Latest Iraq casualty is our national prestige
- SDAI-Tech1 This is your mission...
- re: Just another nail . . .
- Some Perspective
- So the pro-saddam critics are still supporting him. bfd. (n/t)
- KINSLEY: 87 billion excuses, but no apologies
- MUFSON: Show U.S. The Money
- BARBER: Our War's Mistaken Premise
- THOMAS: Declare victory and get out of Iraq
- SANCHEZ: Bush makes Iraq the battleground
